Posted on 07/04/2016 8:30:49 AM PDT by blueunicorn6
What will Attorney General Loretta Lynch decide to do with the Hillary Clinton case?
Will she prosecute?
Will she bail out a fellow Democrat by not prosecuting?
I guess we'll find out.
Until then,
"The best predictor of a person's future behavior is that person's past behavior."
Loretta Lynch has put two Democrat politicians in prison. She put Pedro Espada, Jr. In prison and she put William Boyland, Jr. In prison.
Our best predictor says that she is not afraid to prosecute Democrat politicians. If the evidence is there, she will prosecute Hillary Clinton.
What she will do depends highly on what Bill Clinton’s offer/threat of last week was.
Haven’t you seen all the “news” reports ... No charges will be brought against her.
So there you have it.
If there were any doubt as to the independents of the ABC organizations in the govt. Those illusions are now over.
But then, did anyone with a brain have any doubt.
Does anyone really care?
I think Comey his crew are working more on the Clinton Crime Foundation case than on the emails at this point. They’ve already got enough on the email scandal to prosecute that case five times over, to include espionage charges if they feel heroic!
The Clinton Crime Foundation is the big enchilada. That case potentially involves influence peddling on a massive international scale AND money laundering from speaking fees and foreign donations.
With so much evidence in hand, Comey and the FBI have no choice but to do something. If prosecution is not sought, Comey will lose all professional credibility and the FBI will become a laughingstock. And it won’t stop there. Agents will resign by the boatload and the evidence will be leaked. There is an old saying that the two people you should never piss off are cops and reporters.
Faced with this stark choice — public humiliation for backing down or diligently doing the job he was sworn to do — my guess is that Comey will do the right thing. The entire nation is watching.
“Way safer than sending a nameless courier.”
Except they got caught at it, so it wasn’t very safe. I’d have sent a messenger/courier....
A courier who is low on the food chain and unprotected, might be worse than “caught.” Not to mention he is always open to a higher bidder, as he has no personal stake.
Nor were Clinton and Lynch caught at anything but running into each other. An appearance of impropriety, rather than an impropriety.
People keep expecting baby-murderers to behave ethically all of a sudden.
Keep your eye on this:
“Breitbart News reported that Clinton exchanged numerous names marked by the federal government with “B3 CIA PERS/ORG” redactions, which protect intelligence sources and methods in accordance with the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949. Clinton’s sharing of those names on her non-secure private server could result in the FBI recommending indictment against Clinton for violating the Espionage Act.”
There are many angles to this investigation.
I was thinking that maybe Hillary got Seal Team 6 killed because the Muslim Brotherhood/Huma had access to her server too. Just a thought.
She said she would not do it again. We can assume that It left a bad tate in her mouth.
She will do what she is told
The simple difference is that we have no history of her prosecuting a g*ddam Clinton. No other experience is even in the ballpark.
I’m surprised you would not see that simple difference.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.