Trey Gowdy clearly refuted the earlier Mike Rogers 'investigation' when talking about the new report. He said the earlier 'investigation' didn't even interview anyone who was there during the terrorist attack. I just watched Charles Laine claim the Rogers report said something different and, basically, the report that we should believe is the earlier one. Steve Hayes pointed out that a few of the people on the Rogers Committee wouldn't endorse the final report from Rogers, yet have now endorsed the Gowdy findings. Laine was then quiet. And, of course, Hillary was front and center lauding the NYT headline and then saying 'it's time to move on'. How low our country has fallen, all to protect Dem lies and criminality. Is there anyone who has the courage to come out and say THE PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS WERE INCOMPLETE??? Please???
To: originalbuckeye
They have the airwaves & personnel to repeat the lies enough times, thus it becomes the de facto truth. Everyone will now move on to the next cover up.
To: originalbuckeye
Steve Hayes will be subjected to Charles LAne’s crap for 4 more years, but Steve doesn’t care as long as he is never Trump.
He get’s his kicks from earning debate points with Leftists.
3 posted on
06/28/2016 4:23:34 PM PDT by
dontreadthis
(I finally came up with this tagline)
To: originalbuckeye
We have a criminal government and a criminal media. We will find out in a few short months whether or not we have a criminally stupid voting public as well.
4 posted on
06/28/2016 4:28:16 PM PDT by
TTFlyer
To: originalbuckeye
12 posted on
06/28/2016 8:50:00 PM PDT by
Bon mots
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson