Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


Baili 100+ 100C phone


iPhone 6 which was already in production when the Baili 100C was introduced.

1 posted on 06/17/2016 10:17:55 AM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

Well, I’ll be danged.

That is obviously an exact copy.

Inside and out.

Give up, Apple, you are strudel.


2 posted on 06/17/2016 10:21:08 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (As always, /s is implicitly assumed. Unless explicitly labled /not s. Saves keystrokes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ThunderSleeps; dayglored
Chinese knock off maker sues Apple for "copying" its design of its latest copy of an earlier iPhone design because Apple's own design is superficially similar to their's but really no different than many other Android knock offs. Design Patent Suit. — PING!


Apple
Ping!

The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me

3 posted on 06/17/2016 10:23:55 AM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Well, you can only do so much in a package that size. Apple is famous for their copying expertise. Their logistics and tax dodging is what keeps them in the game, not their software or new ideas.


6 posted on 06/17/2016 10:35:03 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Winning in a local court in China isn’t necessarily uncommon for Chinese companies. Indeed, several lawsuits by Chinese companies against U.S. technology giants including Apple and Tesla TSLA , haven’t turned out so well in lower courts for the American firms. However, when the cases reach a higher court, they’re often overturned. Exactly why there’s such a difference in rulings across lower courts and higher courts is unknown.

Political correctness. It is known... very well. China has a China-first policy. You can expect to lose when you go to court there. It's nice that the higher-ups take a more broad-minded view but that doesn't change the motivation. More than likely, the lower courts are fishing for kick-backs that probably materialize by the time the case reaches the higher courts and the American companies figure out the game.

7 posted on 06/17/2016 10:36:14 AM PDT by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Apple deserves this for offshoring production to a country where the rule of law is not worth a bucket of warm spit.

Eventually the Chinese are going to bite the hand that feed them. It is their nature.


11 posted on 06/17/2016 11:06:00 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (New York Senator Kristin Gillibrand will be the next President of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

So a Chinese company created a knock off and then has the cojones to sue Apple Geezers man


14 posted on 06/17/2016 12:01:50 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson