Posted on 06/10/2016 11:16:48 AM PDT by OneVike
The stories have been around since before the attacks on 9/11, Middle Easterners crossing our Southern Border to mix in with the Hispanics coming in. As far back as before the first Trade Center bombing they have been posing as mexican migrants,
Mahmud Abouhalima, a leader of the 1993 Trade Center bombing, was legalized as a seasonal agricultural worker as part of the 1986 amnesty. Only after he was legalized was he able to travel outside of the country, including several trips to the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, where he received the terrorist training he used in the bombing. Abdel Hakim Tizegha, involved in the millennium plot, sneaked across the border posing as a Mexican migrant. [ Free Republic ]
Then there is the account by border rancher, George Morgan, who related a holiday incident he witness in 1998,
“It was Thanksgiving 1998, and I stepped outside my house and there were over a hundred ‘crossers’ in my yard. Damnedest bunch of illegals I ever saw. All of them were wearing black pants, white shirts and string ties. Maybe they were hoping to blend in,” he chuckled. “They took off, I called the Border Patrol, and a while later, an agent, Dan Green, let me know that they had caught them. He said that they were all Iranians.” [ WND ]
Before and after 9/11, Muslim Terrorists have been posing as Hispanics to cross our Southern border. We even had a report in 2005 that the terrorists have teamed up with Mexican drug cartels.
The 2005 report outlines an ongoing scheme in which multiple Middle Eastern drug-trafficking and terrorist cells operating in the U.S. fund terror networks overseas, aided by established Mexican cartels with highly sophisticated trafficking routes.
These terrorist groups, or sleeper cells, include people who speak Arabic, Spanish and Hebrew and, for the most part, arouse no suspicion in their communities.
Rep. Ed Royce of California, ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs terrorism and nonproliferation subcommittee, said the DEA document substantiates information that his committee has been given.
[ Washington Times]
11 years later, after Trump stated during a debate that ISIS is ready to launch 9/11 type attacks on America, the Dept of Homeland Security confirmed the Donald's statement as fact. As if we needed confirmation.
A top ranking official at the Department for Homeland Security confirms Mexican drug cartels are helping the Islamic State (ISIS) sneak across the Southern border to study targets for terrorist attacks. According to reports, ISIS operative Shaykh Mahmood Omar Khabir has been training Islamic militants near the border, close to Ciudad Juarez for a year.
[ Washington Times]
Well, fast forward to Trump's San Jose rally. Thousands of protestors, many of whom were paid $15.00, attacked those who attended the rally. Videos of the attacks even forced Obama to publicly act as if he was shocked such attacks would take place.
All this to state the obvious. Many who were among the protestors were not American citizens, they were illegals from South America. However, what many may or may not realize is that among those illegal Hispanics, were Middle easterners. To be more specific, embedded Terrorists who have melted into the Hispanic populations illegally in the United states and agitating the crowds.
When you look at the videos of the rallies they protest, you will see many so-called Hispanics who have full thick black beards. Well there is a problem with this picture, because darker skinned Hispanics cannot grow thick beards. Oh, I'm sure there are acceptation's to the rule, but because of their Indian blood darker skinned Hispanics do not have much facial hair. So even if they are able to grow a beard, it will not be scraggly not thick. Thus the reason most dark skinned Hispanics are clean shaven. However, the Middle easterners who are posing as Hispanics can grow great looking thick beards.
So, they may be able to speak Hispanic and even look like Hispanics due to their dark skin and black hair, but if they are sporting a thick beard, they give away their ruse. Something that needs to be watched as the general election gears up. There will be many illegals protesting and rioting along with the usual crowds of Black Lives Matter, Communists, agitated Students, and Greenies. However, don't expect the MSM to point out how the genetics of Hispanics has changed so drastically that they can now grow thick beards.
What Obama, Hillary, and their money men like George Soros don't realize is that the more problems these protesting rioters create, the more popular Donald trump is going to get. Just like Nixon benefited from the Summer of hate of 1968, so too will Trump be swept into the white House by an American electorate that will crawl over broken glass to vote for him.
Like we see in Europe, we can expect things to get worse as the hate and violence supported by the Fascist leftists see their power slipping away. Obama has made sure their are over 10 million more documented Muslims in America than there was when he first took office in "09". Only God knows how many millions of Muslim Terrorists have came across our unprotected Southern border since then, with many of them probably joining the protesting riots. It's time to stay vigilant, and keep you powder dry my FRiends, because America will never be the same again
The late 8 years have been total hate from liberals and the obamabots on america, white christians.
I believe you 100%. 68’ was the most turbulent year of our lifetime and the voters settled it in November. 1980 was the 2nd most turbulent year of note. 2016 is ALREADY lining up to be the 3rd.
I was a little busy in ‘68. And it’s YUUUUGE! At least I’m hopin’ it is.
***Like The Summer of Hate of 68, Gave Nixon A Win, ****
I remember those days. What gave NIXON the win was Bobby Kennedy being shot dead by a Palestinian. Kennedy would have won hands down.
Nixon’s politcal career was considered dead when, after losing to John Kennedy, he also ran and lost the governorship of California to Pat Brown.
The historical comparisons are very similar, you make a very logical argument, thanks.
He won in a landslide. At the time the polls were not kind to democrats because of Vietnam. That’s why Johnson refused to run for re-election.
So we will never know, but at the time of Kennedy’s assassination, The Democrats were not looking good for the White House.
Nixon won the EC pretty comfortably but barely squeaked by in the popular vote, which was almost as close as the vote he lost in 1960. He had a big lead but it melted away in the weeks before the election. Had the election been a week later, he might have lost.
Bobby Kennedy was not going to be President in 1968. He had too many enemies among the party bosses. They still controlled the nominating apparatus in 1968, and they were not going to give him the nomination.
I agree to a certain point. I differ in that I doubt he would have lost if the election been another Month longer even. We’ll never know.
My point was that Kennedy was not going to win.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.