Both needed a scapegoat, somebody to blame all our troubles on and both claimed that only the government could fix the problem. Hitler blamed the Jews, Hillary blames the conservatives and the rich, although she is one of them.
Be careful of Godwin’s law.
It is the central point of fascism.
Somebody ought to give Glenn Beck this clue, he keeps thinking its Trump that’s the second Hitler.
She is less like Hitler and more like Ernst Thalmann, the Stalinist who ran against Hitler. If she wins, we will not become Nazi Germany, but rather the American version of the former USSR—which we are approaching already via the present occupant of the Oval Office.
P.S. Don’t read into this that I think Trump is Hitler, because I don’t think he is Hitler. As I’ve said over the last year, he is the Biblical equivalent of Jehu, and Hillary is Jezebel (or Athaliah, take your pick).
How about comparing Hillary with Dr. Janice Lester of the Star Trek TOS episode “Turnabout Intruder”?
Hitler. He only had one ball. Killary has none.
Since you are a WWII buff, you no doubt know the original title Hitler wanted for My Struggle. For anyone who doesn’t know, it was, ‘Four and a Half Years of Struggle Against Lies, Stupidity and Cowardice.’
Hillary Clinton is our version of Winnie Mandela.
Hitler explains Hillary Clinton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do9sBJuLpZs
Hitler interviews Hillary Clinton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UF8Fj9vTLk
The minute you say the “H” word (Hitler, not Cankles) people start rolling their eyes, but there are some similarities in the political situation.
In the late 1920s, Weimar Germany had several political parties. The Nazis were NOT the majority, but by 1932 held about 44% of the vote in the Reichstag. They took control when their allies, the Nationalist Party, voted to make Hitler Chancellor, with 52% of the total vote.
A majority of Germans never voted for Hitler, but a majority allowed him to come to power by not aligning with the Catholic Center Party (for whatever reason). Can you say “NeverTrumpers?” These are precisely the people who will have blood on their hands if Trump does not win the presidency, for they have not allied against a great evil because of their personal pettiness.
Hillary is not an ideologist (E). Her ideology is strictly based on getting elected and getting paid. She is a money and power hungry witch without ideology. She’ll rant on and on about “women’s rights” then help multiple rapists get off when the money or power gain is right.
She’ll stay left first term to get a second since that’s how she thinks she’ll win (unless Kristol and friends convince her otherwise and she becomes a “conservative” like them). But her presidency will go to whoever pays Bill the most for speeches and increases her off-shore bank accounts regardless of the payer’s ideology or what they want in return.
Psychologically speaking Hillary is a strange case. Her foremost trait is pathological lying. Add to that guilt-free theft, as she broke some priceless WH treasures and stole truckloads more. I’m not enough of a Hitler aficionado to know the degree to which he lied, but I’ve read that, unlike Hillary, he didn’t engage in a never ending, often illegal pursuit of wealth, driven be insatiable greed.
Two more Hillary traits: a simply abject mania for secrecy, and a willingness to endure decades of humiliation by her husband. Afaik, Obama is the only other major poll that comes anywhere close to Hillary for compulsive secrecy, and can you see Hitler tolerating partner-infidelity for even an entire ten seconds?
One major similarity: both Hillary and Hitler believed death to be the perfect solution for individuals who threatened them politically.
Think about the contradiction involved: Hillary is uncharismatic; people don't like Hillary; she's an unimaginative creature of machine politics; she's part of the established system and doesn't make waves: and then all of a sudden she's Hitler? It makes no sense.
Hitler had only one ball, but Hillary has two.