Posted on 05/08/2016 7:08:06 PM PDT by GOPAreDemProgressives
There’s only one Democratic candidate not linked to an ongoing FBI investigation, and his name is Bernie Sanders. Vermont’s Senator will become Democratic nominee for many reasons, but a cyber hacker named “Guccifer” just solidified the fact only one candidate can type an email without scandal. Superdelegates exist so that Republicans like Donald Trump won’t use FBI investigations and foreign hackers against a Democratic nominee.
Forget about foreign hackers for a moment, and listen to the words of Defense Secretary Robert Gates. These words are highlighted in a Hill article titled Ex-Pentagon chief: Iran, China or Russia may have gotten to Clinton server:
Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates says he believes foreign countries like Russia, China and Iran may have hacked the private email server Hillary Clinton used while secretary of State. “...I think the odds are pretty high,” he said Gates said he agreed with former acting CIA Director Mike Morell’s claim that the server had probably been hacked by either Russia, China or Iran. He added that the fact that classified intelligence has been found on the server was “a concern for me.” “I never used email when I was head of CIA or head of the Department of Defense,” Gates said.
Gates believes other nations most likely compromised Clinton’s server. If you don’t trust the recent statements of a Romanian hacker (I believe him), do you trust the views of President Obama’s former Defense Secretary?
Furthermore, imagine if anyone else had endured a year-long FBI criminal investigation. As The Wall Street Journal stated in March, “The criminal investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email setup is clearly progressing, leaving some officials hopeful the case could wrap up in a matter of months.”
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...
Bingo.
Especially if Democrat governors give the right to vote to felons. They think of her as one of them!
He was but it was fairly recently that he arrived here.
Also, DC Rumor Central was running full speed on Monday, but it was very unusual. We all knew something was coming, but no one really knew what it was.
It was obvious that they were circling the wagons at WH. There was even a rumor that ran full speed for a while that Billary were splitting. No one could get Carville on phone, so that meant something was going on.
When it broke, no one got to bed before 2:00 AM, and phones were HOT.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is the DNC chairperson this go around.
Hillary is in. Hillary has the nomination. Nothing short of a meteor strike will stop that now.
Our only hope is that Bernie runs independent. The math simply won’t be NEAR what Hillary would need in the general election.
I heard a joke that Warren’s plan to be President is be Hillary’s VP and then become President when Hillary is indicted/locked up.
I’m sorry, I said “our only hope” I didn’t mean that. Trump has the numbers.
But Clinton will rig the election It’s what those types do. If she wins against Trump then we would be scrambling for numbers. If she wins against trump AND Bernie is still in the race, then the numbers simply cant be argued with.
They are impossible. Bernie on the ballot WILL mean no president Clinton.
But she has a vagina. A VAGINA! For goodness sake.
The unJustice department guaranteed the first part of your assertion, telling the world that Clinton did not do anything illegal thus she will nto be indicted ... and the globalist masters guarantee the second part.
Fox had the story first, but his credibiliy depends on his actually producing copies of Hillary’s correspondence. So far that hasn’t happened.
Dimocratz can’t afford to have Bernie represent their party; the party won’t survive!
More likely they’ll stage a fatal accident to avoid Bernie leading the Party.
Look for a late entry by Uncle Joe.
DWS is figurehead. The old lib $ people running things.
She will be indicted, or listed as un-indicted co-conspirator and drop out / be forced out.
Ds just hope it’s after Bernie drops out so Biden/Warren can come in.
I’m getting 3-1 odds on that from D friends, and laying all I can. :)
Strac6 wrote:
“...The recent “leaked” Clinton Campaign statements have tried to claim..... “well, none of it was with intent.”
That is BS, because under the federal statutes involved, an act of omission is as bad as an act of omission.
BTW, the law in questions does not require mens rea, a “criminal mind” i.e. intent. It’s a prosecutor’s dream. It removed at least 50 % of the burden of a typical case. ...”
Very important!
Commission or omission, intent or no intent, the breach is the same...
The exceptionally grave damage is the same...
Agreed.
Trump didn’t destroy Warren, all he did was bring up more old news. If old news about Trump’s past doesn’t sway Trump voters, then why would you think old news about Warren would sway Warren voters? They’ve known Fauxcahontas wasn’t an Indian princess all along, now they’d simply do what libs always do and say you are what you feel you are.
Facts don’t mean anything anymore to either side, because truth apparently has an expiration date.
He does look more trustworthy than Hillary. However, that’s a pretty large group and getting larger.
Not only could Trump beat Bernie, it would be a valuable argument for this country. Freedom vs tyranny (socialism). It would be a wisdom gathering summer / fall, especially for our young people educated at the fonts of socialism and thus thoroughly ignorant.
Good post.
I’m about to put a Bernie sign in my yard to help that little troll out.
My town would lynch me though. And that’s why I love my town.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.