I would just nitpick a bit. A 5-4 decision is seen as a mandate if it supports the liberal view of an issue. For example liberals consider the 5-4 decision on homosexual marriage as being a civil rights mandate which should never be reviewed.
But liberals say that a decision such as Heller or Hobby Lobby lack a mandate and should be reviewed and overturned. I believe that both were 5-4,,but were 5-4 for the conservative view.
This election is do or die.
I hope the Cruzloyalists soon come to realize that the country is more important than their idol’s ambitions.
I don’t think that will be true of the Cubanadian or he wouldn’t even be running.
Don’t ever forget that this bitch’s husband tried taking the 2A to court saying it didn’t give We The People the right to keep and bear arms. He lost the case and good for us. The ‘Rats’’ are all about disarming We The People for obvious reasons.
I watched that movie the other night “The Brave one” that stars Jodie Foster, and it’s about this woman and her fiance who get mugged in Central park New York city by a group of thugs, her fiance gets beaten to death and she survives and the rest of the movie is her getting revenge blah blah. But I thought it was telling, in that city you must get attacked and killed first rather than have the right to defend yourself, she has to buy an illegal gun first before she gets the revenge which by then is too late, because the fiance is already dead and I thought, isn’t that SO typical of New York city? If she or the fiance had a gun in the FIRST place it would have been over before it even started. And it’s not a movie, it’s not fiction, people all the time get killed in that city because they have no means of self defense. That movie was a primo example of how 2nd amendment unconstitutional infringement gets people killed, it does the exact opposite of what liberals scream it does. If your life is threatened you are helpless, you are going to die because that city is infested with oath breaking armed bodyguarded protected punk politicians
“We’re one Supreme Court Justice away from losing the 2nd Amendment.” - Mark Levin, January 19, 2016
Americans need to stop thinking about “Me! Me! Me!” and selfies and start thinking about their freedom. This is serious stuff. The Bill of Rights is on the line if this Nazi/Commie/Muzzie ho wins in November. Mark my words.
Even if the Second Amendment is repealed, it doesn’t mean we lose the right to effectively defend ourselves against those more powerful, more numerous and less-principled than ourselves.
Remember how much chaos two guys with a rifle and an old beater of a car, shooting one round at a time, caused in the DC area a few years ago.
Consider how much trouble Christopher Dorner could have caused if he’d just kept his mouth shut and continued randomly shooting policemen....
.. She has literally said that the Supreme Court was wrong in the Heller decision and that the Court should overturn and remove the individual’s right to keep and bear arms...
Removing the individuals’ right to keep and bear arms didnt work out so well for George III and his Redcoats beginning at Lexington to his ultimate defeat at Yorktown. This is a right that won’t disappear easily.
State nullification. Long past time the state Governors grow a pair and did the right thing.
Let’s stop having the tail wag the dog.
I’ve always wondered how a person running for an office for which they have to take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States can, at the same time, scheme to condemn and eviserate the same Constitution they just pledged allegiance to.
How is this not treason?
The Supreme Court is always the stick they pull out to keep us voting for Oligarch-Ccorporate Shill-Globalists.