Replies

To: driftdiver

That’s probably a thousand calorie drink. At Starbucks. They deserve to be insulted.

12 posted on 04/09/2016 9:12:10 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd

To: Responsibility2nd

So you think it’s good business for a company to insult it’s customers?

You must also be supportive of government control of soft drinks.

18 posted on 04/09/2016 9:14:06 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)

To: Responsibility2nd

"That’s probably a thousand calorie drink. They deserve to be insulted."

It's none of your business, is it?

19 posted on 04/09/2016 9:17:10 AM PDT by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)

To: Responsibility2nd

That’s probably a thousand calorie drink. At Starbucks. They deserve to be insulted.

_________________________________________________

So, you are also one of those folks who blame McDonalds and other fast food joints who offer high calorie meals?

If people want the 1000 calorie drinks, how is that Starbucks’ fault?

Maybe you forgot the sarc tag?

36 posted on 04/09/2016 9:30:21 AM PDT by Artcore (Trump 2016!)

To: Responsibility2nd

Made me look, 500.

48 posted on 04/09/2016 9:40:17 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$

To: Responsibility2nd

And this is the kind of “logic” that is used to ban sodas over 16 oz, pass sugar taxes, etc...

Slippery slope.

53 posted on 04/09/2016 9:53:36 AM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)

To: Responsibility2nd

I think it is kind to alert the customer to the unhealthy product you are about to serve them.

66 posted on 04/09/2016 10:35:23 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Ted Cruz was the man!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794