Posted on 04/08/2016 3:49:18 PM PDT by conservativejoy
Mark just announced he will Never Vote for Trump and gave all the reasons why on today's radio program.
Dammit, where’s my shocked face?!
Please Marky old buddy old pal, you fancy yourself the expert on all things constitutional and yet - not ONE freakin call taken regarding barry the fraud and his background.
Sad really, but I’m thankful his deceit has been exposed.
Levin books go in the trash tonight.
I’ve had it with these “he’s not a real conservative talk show guys”. I’m leaving the Republican Party. I want nothing more to do with them. I’m finished with Levin and his trashing of trump. That goes for prager - medved- crystal - will Ben Shapiro. Beck. Hewitt.
Hannity and rush I can tolerate at the moment.
Look I don’t even like trump. I’m voting for the guy who had the balls to stand up and take the heat. I don’t have to personally like the guy. I have to feel he has my back on at least 1 or 2 major issues. Border and economy. Those are my two.
Cruz is a fake, a phony. He gives me the Heebie Jeebies. I see through the that guy. I will never ever vote for him.
A new party needs to be formed and hopefully trump will do just that. The America First party. Something along those lines.
Savage is close with language /borders / culture. But I think a better triad is: borders / work / culture.
You and others keep repeating this but it doesn't make it fact. The definition of a RINO is a Republican who works hand-in-hand with Democrats and advance their agenda.
Trump was never in elective office where he did such a thing, and what's funny is if he hadn't run, you and others would be having circular arguments over who was more conservative, Bush/Rubio/Kasich etc.
Thank Mark Levin for the vote for HILLARY. I voted for their damned candidates the last two times and LOST .. McCain and Romney. What does it matter if I vote? I got Obama anyway didn’t I?
Look, Jim, his dog died FIVE years ago. He wrote a book on Muffy. He has been in a funk, and has taken his colossal depression out on America, daily, ever since.
Sheesh, have you no “compassion”? .>/
It might be helpful to consider how Fr. Pavone, Priests for Life, handled a recent report in the MSM. Although he is making a statement correcting some bad reporting, I really liked his approach and how he identifies the deeper core issues. His comments on the difference between Trump and Sander/Clinton is spot on in my opinion. He is being both pastoral and pragmatic about the candidates:
WASHINGTON, DC (Catholic Online) - Fr. Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests for Life, issued the following statement on April 7, 2016:
Yesterday, a number of media outlets reported a story incorrectly regarding the relationship of Donald Trump to the pro-life movement, and I would like to correct the record.
Neither Mr. Trump nor anyone associated with him or his campaign cancelled a meeting or phone call with pro-life leaders, nor did they break any commitment, promise, appointment, or expectation.
In my role as National Director of Priests for Life, I arrange various events and conversations, some public and some confidential, between candidates and various leaders, groups, and activists in the pro-life movement. Moreover, we provide, in a non-partisan way, advice and information on abortion to any candidate or campaign seeking such advice or information.
In that context, we consider the door to be fully open to Mr. Trump and his campaign, and he has a standing invitation to dialogue, both on the record and off the record, with the leaders of the pro-life movement. Such communication and dialogue are essential with anyone who is running for the highest office in the land, on a topic of the highest moral significance.
But I cannot comment on arrangements that have been made or are being made when those arrangements or events are confidential. I stress again, however, that no commitments have been broken, nor has Mr. Trump or his campaign given me any indication of a lack of interest.
Much has been made of his recent comments about who should be punished for abortion. As for punishing the woman, those who have had abortions are already in prison. As the Pastoral Director of the world’s largest ministry of healing after abortion, Rachel’s Vineyard, and also of the Silent No More Awareness Campaign, by which those who have had abortions speak out about their experiences, I know this very well.
We don’t aim to imprison them, we aim to liberate them from the shame and guilt and wounds abortion brings. The punishment should be for the abortionist, not the baby’s mom. I have not spoken to Mr. Trump about this, but do look forward to doing so, and I am confident that he will listen to the voices and testimonies of women who suffer from abortion.
But Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton have also made comments recently on abortion, including in a Town Hall on Fox News with Bret Baier. Sanders could name no circumstance, and Hillary hardly any, in which they thought it would be OK to make a single abortion illegal. That position is out of step with the American people. And neither of them has corrected or edited those comments.
Those who — mistakenly — think there should be a punishment for the women are much easier to bring to the right position than those who take the even more outrageous, offensive, and disastrous position — like Sanders, Clinton, and the Democratic platform — that the dismemberment and decapitation of children should continue in a practically unlimited way.
In the former position, there’s an acknowledgment that society has to do something about the massive holocaust of children. In the latter position, there is a blatant disregard for the most fundamental right, the right to life.
Priests for Life continues to be ready to discuss an issue of such monumental importance with all the candidates and their campaigns.
—
Yes, he’s outed.
I remember when Reagan was running, the liberal teachers where I worked said they were voting for him, albeit quietly, because for them, it all came down to their personal pocketbook, and they had had enough of Carter’s impact on their finances.
How is Levin any different? He’s voting for his own personal pocketbook, just like my formal, liberal colleagues.
Mess=meds
He reacted like a child and needs to grow up.
Well stated!!
I agree with Mark 99% of the time. But I don’t agree with not voting for Trump if he gets the nomination.
Thank God for that!
He’s pissed because he got exposed for taking cash from Cruz so he blames Trump
No, Trump is a RINO.
Otherwise he doesn’t go to Wisconsin two weeks ago and start berating Scott Walker and telling those of us here that Walker needed to “raise taxes” versus cutting them.
There is no justification for ever raising taxes unless we’re in a war and need to supply the troops.
You’re making some good points.
Absolutely. Schizophenic, or bipolar? One sad sack of bitterness, no matter how you cut it.
What did Stone do?
#NeverLevin
I outgrew his incessant whining years ago, and he copied his sirens and underground bunker nonsense from G. Gordon Liddy’s radio show.
Get off the air, you big dummy.
Levin’s just depressing anyway. He’s Beck without the insanity. He’s Savage with marginally less screaming. Everything’s the end of the country and we SHOULD ALL BE PISSED!
No thanks. I’ll listen to Rush and go about my day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.