Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Heartlander

>>Hmmm...Darwin didn’t this so<<

Irrelevant. The thoughts Darwin had beyond TTOE are not in the Theory itself. Quoting (or quotemining) Darwin is irrelevant to the argument at hand.

Not only is not a winner, it is a non-starter.


56 posted on 04/07/2016 3:52:06 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003
Just to clarify - the fact that experts in the field and even Darwin himself disagree with you is irrelevant?

If we were built by a process which did not have us in mind but is merely tuned for survival, then like it or not, there must be a Darwinian explanation for our thoughts and behavior. Put another way, one cannot claim that Darwinism made our brains but has no bearing on the brain's contents. This is what makes Darwin's theory unique to science as most people familiar with his theory know.

60 posted on 04/07/2016 4:11:05 PM PDT by Heartlander (Prediction: Increasingly, logic will be seen as a covert form of theism. - Denyse O'Leary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson