“We have lots of evidence he left for us.”
Do we? Yes, humans and apes are genetically similar...but to date, archeologists have dug up ape remains and they’ve dug up human remains...but never the remains of a being that was ‘in between’.
There has to be a central flaw in the theory of evolution. If evolutionary changes are brought about by random mutations that prove to be beneficial, over thousands of years, wouldn’t the fossil record be transitional? We should be finding half hoofed, half thumbed, etc skeletal remains all over the place. But we don’t.
I’m no theologian...but just logic alone makes the theory of evolution very improbably.
There is. Please note that while claiming to be "scientific," every piece of evidence found is not treated as a possible refutation of evolution, but often as a heroic struggle to fit that evidence into the evolutionary framework.
>> Yes, humans and apes are genetically similar...but to date, archeologists have dug up ape remains and they’ve dug up human remains...but never the remains of a being that was ‘in between’.. (sic)<<
If you understood TTOE you would know there is no such thing. Your statement is scientifically wrong and your conclusion is accordingly wrong.
I suggest you study a subject before opining.