Posted on 03/21/2016 5:17:20 AM PDT by Herzo61
Let's have a 7 to 2 SCOTUS
I believe you are actually serious.
Lol! That's what big government liberals always say to conservatives. I'll give you guys that much - statists are consistent.
You want to see stupid, check out all the trumpaloompas on this thread who are too dense to realize they are on the same team as the guy who started the thread. If you don't write in big crayon words of four letters or less, you'll confuse more than two thirds of your trump audience.
“Cruz Bots tell me what States he can win?”
I’m not a “Cruz Bot”, but doesn’t the polling show Cruz doing better than Trump in the general?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/pres_general/
Yeah? Well I would never even read a thread like this.
If the stoooo-pid fits . . . .
It the GOP establishment runs a 3rd party candidate, they would hurt Hillary more.
Exactly my point. They’re still posting angry things at him!
Trump is going to make a great president. I think we will all be pleasantly surprised!!! Trumps desire to succeed will NOT let him fail, he will surround himself with the best, and all of you naysayers will be quite surprised !!!!
Didn’t trump already provide the names of individuals he’d name to the court? From what I read at the time, they were solid, strict constitutionalist picks.
His words. If he is his adviser on foreign affairs then why should he listen to anyone else on domestic matters?
“I will NEVER respond to a post like this.”
me neither!
uh, wait...
and I will never respond to your response on a post like this
uh, wait....
I am voting for Trump. Because he has the balls to try and “stack the court”.
There is nothing in the constitution that says their are 9 justices on the SCOTUS. There were times we had less, there were times we had more. Congress decides if we can have more or less.
The U.S. Constitution established the Supreme Court but left it to Congress to decide how many justices should make up the court. The Judiciary Act of 1789 set the number at six: a chief justice and five associate justices. In 1807, Congress increased the number of justices to seven; in 1837, the number was bumped up to nine; and in 1863, it rose to 10. In 1866, Congress passed the Judicial Circuits Act, which shrank the number of justices back down to seven and prevented President Andrew Johnson from appointing anyone new to the court. Three years later, in 1869, Congress raised the number of justices to nine.
So if we run the mill in Congress, with Trump as President, he could nominate more after consulting with key Congressional office holders, and bump the number from 9 to 11.
The Dems and the media will go nuts of course. And some will say this sets the venue where later the Dems if in power will raise it to 13. Maybe - but I am telling you they are already planning that if they run both the executive and congress again after they flood America with the turd world.
But Trump’s economy will be such a relief to Americans that they will have Trump in for two terms and R’s running things for an entire decade, so let’s strike first.
Also I want to see a 4% fee on all dollars sent to Mexico via those “send money to Mexico” operations. That is how Mexico will pay for the wall.
In the new world Trump is building any poll that reveals something negative about The Donald is just poopy stuff and the poll takers should be killed.
Trumprangers tell each other ridiculous made up facts ("Trump will win 50 states!" "Trump will carry the woman vote!" "Hispanics love Trump!") and they repeat these fantasies back and forth to each other until they all believe the insanity to be true.
I'm starting to think that maybe a brain virus from space was dumped here by a meteorite. Nothing else makes sense.
Well, that’s the attitude that will probably lead me to not vote for Trump in the general election. If it means destroying the rest of the GOP — which means turning all of Congress over to the Democrats — I suppose it’s better that he loses, and we save the Senate and House. Much easier to fix a lost Presidential election than to lose all of Congress.
Good. Now get lost.
Well, I’ll accept that as a challenge!
There’s NO WAY I will EVER respond to the THREE of you, either as a group or singularly.
I hope I have made myself sufficiently clear.
Lol, you’re right, nothing else does make sense.
I am not only not going to pretend not to read it, I am not going to respond that I will pretend not to respond!
So there...
Before you joined Team Trump, you used to be so smart, able to read beyond a six-word headline. Now look at you! What did they do to you Laz!!
Ok I read it. You got me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.