Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurkinanloomin
Your reply is meaningless.

If you aren't following a thread, you shouldn't comment on it.

The OP that started this thread made a claim that it was incredible that "no one covers" "the fact" that Ted Cruz would be the first President not actually born in the US.

No one covers it, because it is not "a fact." NONE of the Founders were born in the United States. Attempts to salvage his fraudulent abuse of history by attempting to change the subject do not change the historical record.

66 posted on 03/20/2016 12:38:13 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Fifth Avenue to be Born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna

Your reply is ludicrous, the founders exempted themselves from the natural born citizen requirement but expected it to be followed after that. No President after those exempted has been born in a foreign country.


74 posted on 03/20/2016 12:45:19 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: FredZarguna

The wording in the Constitution specifically excludes those early Presidents, but not someone who was a dual-citizen in 2014, seeking the Office of President two years later.


101 posted on 03/20/2016 1:21:43 PM PDT by jennings2004 ("What difference, at this point, does it make!"! Senator Cruz: Canadian from birth to May, 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson