Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I Voted For Trump... a last minute decision...
My Own Self | 3-17-16 | Elad Eirhtug

Posted on 03/17/2016 9:46:49 AM PDT by dps.inspect

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-168 next last
To: dps.inspect

I think a Trump/Cruz ticket would make the liberals’ heads explode...


141 posted on 03/17/2016 3:55:39 PM PDT by Crusher138 ("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Crusher138

True, though there’s a lot of hatchets to bury before it can happen.


142 posted on 03/17/2016 4:09:47 PM PDT by Luircin (Supervillians for Trump: We're sick of being the lesser evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

your tagline lol

***

Heh heh heh.

JOIN US. You’re already on the Trump side so you know that the liberals are already going to call you evil.

Might as well enjoy it, am I right?


143 posted on 03/17/2016 4:11:36 PM PDT by Luircin (Supervillians for Trump: We're sick of being the lesser evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Obama clearly based his entire political career as the manifestation of Saul Alinsky principles. When I see Trump, I feel like it is deja vu all over again.


144 posted on 03/17/2016 4:16:23 PM PDT by crusher (GREEN: Globaloney for the Gullible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: crusher

They work. Its a new era - American politics will never be the same.


145 posted on 03/17/2016 4:17:01 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: lucky american

I am for Trump.

Yet, I agree totally that it is dishonest to blame Ted Cruz for supporting Roberts for SC justice. We all thought it was a good choice ‘on paper’ and no one should be faulted for failing to anticipate what a disappointment he would turn out to be.

Furthermore, as a Trump supporter, I was very uncomfortable whenever Trump used that against Cruz in the debates.

Remember though, Trump brought up Cruz’s support for Roberts in retaliation for Cruz insisting, time after time, that Trump would nominate liberal judges to the Supreme Court, liberal judges who he said would subvert the 2nd amendment, support partial birth abortion, and a whole litany of far left agendas. By so doing, Cruz was attempting paint Trump as a liberal which was fair game, but as soon as he argued that case it became fair game for Trump to rebut that Cruz had supported Roberts.

As a Trump supporter who believes Trump is strongly pro 2nd amendment, pro life and honestly wishes to nominate originalists in the mold of Scalia, as he says, I was annoyed with Cruz’s sideways attacks on Trump as a liberal, and thought Trump’s rebuttal was very fair in the context of “people who live in glass houses should not throw stones.”

In fact, I must say that Cruz’s ‘clever’ use of implication, entrapment and false association to malign his opponents while all the time appearing civil, is what first turned me off about him. Maybe that’s a cool for a prosecutor in a criminal case or at least other prosecutors think it’s cool, but I don’t like it.


146 posted on 03/17/2016 7:37:33 PM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dware

Trump is like King David. Not a perfect man and has committed sins, but is the man of the hour. He doesn’t wear his religion on his sleeves, but his charitable actions speak louder than words.


147 posted on 03/17/2016 9:20:03 PM PDT by jackal7163 (If you are not willing to achieve victory at any cost, you are doomed to defeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jackal7163

Churchill could be boorish at times, he screwed up at Gallipoli, but thank God he was there for Britain in her darkest hour.


148 posted on 03/17/2016 9:22:01 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

You are gonna rub in MO going for two Dims until the CA primary at least aren’t you?


149 posted on 03/17/2016 9:35:51 PM PDT by Flying Circus (God save us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Roger that!


150 posted on 03/17/2016 9:45:31 PM PDT by jackal7163 (If you are not willing to achieve victory at any cost, you are doomed to defeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

The reason Reagan’s marriage to Jane Wyman was declared hull had nothing to do with how their marriage ended.

Jane Wyman was married very briefly, in 1937, and was divorced. She married Reagan in 1940, and sought a divorce from him in 1949.

Wyman became a Catholic in 1954, and at that time obtained a declaration of nullity of her marriage to Reagan, because of her 1937 marriage, which was valid, and therefore indissoluble.

So Reagan, the first “divorced President,” was, in the judgment of the Catholic Church, validly married to Nancy Reagan.

Moon Reagan returned to the Catholic Church as an adult, and did pester Ronnie some about doing the same. I suspect that Moon would have mentioned that Ronnie and Nancy’s marriage was no obstacle, since it was valid.


151 posted on 03/17/2016 10:37:45 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: jackal7163

I heard Steve Deace briefly on the radio.

Apparently, Deace is still a Cruz slappy, sticking with the theory that the best President is the one who thumps the Bible and shouts “To God be the glory!” the loudest.


152 posted on 03/17/2016 10:45:08 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

“Moon Reagan”

Are you referring to Maureen?


153 posted on 03/17/2016 10:54:25 PM PDT by Pelham (more than election. Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect

Mainly because he’s Christian?

I’m gonna just shut up

I’m glad you came over


154 posted on 03/17/2016 10:57:00 PM PDT by wardaddy (Cruz path to nomination is a box canyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect

Btw nice screed

Pretty much like my own transformation back in the late summer

My wife went to Trump first.....yes hit me with the jokes


155 posted on 03/17/2016 10:58:51 PM PDT by wardaddy (Cruz path to nomination is a box canyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria

Wow, I’ve heard of a few black pastors joining the juggernaut but never saw this one... thanks!


156 posted on 03/18/2016 4:29:35 AM PDT by dps.inspect (quite well)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect
so when I see them descend on Trump with the same ferocity that I know they hold toward me and my kind, I count Trump as my kind

And, not for nothing, a ferocity that they never, ever, not one time displayed toward Barack Hussein Obama.

It's all coming out now, everything done in the dark will be brought to the light, the alliances that are destroying our nation are being revealed, one by one.

And I will go further and say that all this revelation is the work of one man, as you say, barely a Christian, but scripture shows us over and over the type of men He uses to accomplish His purposes, even though they be unaware of the true work they are doing.

You done good, brother.

157 posted on 03/18/2016 4:40:25 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown, are by desperate appliance relieved, or not at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest
people aren’t fazed by dirt on him because they know he isn’t perfect and have chosen to not follow the usual smear tactics by the media and the Uniparty

Well, there's that, plus the fact that the Evangelical-pandering wing of the Uniparty whispers appealing words in their ears while dealing with demons behind their back.

If the Lord had wanted to win an election in Judea, He would have chosen Caiaphas, or another appealing Pharisee, as His candidate.

But that's not how He works with us.

158 posted on 03/18/2016 4:46:35 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown, are by desperate appliance relieved, or not at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Yes, I have and I will... I don’t hate the man, I just don’t like the man... AND, make no mistake, if Cruz somehow becomes the nominee, I will be voting for him... a no vote is a vote for Hitlery!


159 posted on 03/18/2016 5:19:02 AM PDT by dps.inspect (quite well)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

“I would be very happy with this outcome and I think most conservatives would support it. It’s a win-win!”

I agree! I would even support Cruz dropping out now if Trump would let Cruz advise him on SC nominees.


160 posted on 03/18/2016 6:18:07 AM PDT by navet97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson