Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: uncitizen
Gellar’s staged provocation was not “ wrong” but then, what was her intention? To create and showcase another example of muslim intolerance.

Then what? Then what?

Trump is a business guy. He makes deals. He has to handle adversarial interests and pull out a deal. Maybe both sides get something, maybe just his side wins. I think he tends toward win- win but never Lose.

He already said in the case of Israel vs Palestine that if both sides don't think he is fair, he can't make a deal between them. That's gonna make the hard core on both sides unhappy. But it is speaking real common sense truth

Fact is Gellar doesn't have the goal of being the President of the US of all the people, and of having to bring them together or at worst case, make them safe from each other.

She is an activist, he is a candidate for the US presidency. The U.S. president will never approve of or participate In a stunt to deliberately provoke a religious or ethnic group. Like approving of the Klan sheeting up for a parade. Free speech aye. Useful speech no

That doesn't mean he can or will stop provocative free expression it, but he may criticize it as not useful at best

If his saying so offends a special snowflake as a personal attack, they will just have to tough it out. He isn't going to apologize for hurting their feeeelings

78 posted on 03/15/2016 8:52:07 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: silverleaf

In other words, Pamela Geller has core values. Trump not so much.


81 posted on 03/15/2016 8:54:03 AM PDT by Dagnabitt (Islamic Immigration is Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: silverleaf

I wasn’t really disagreeing with you. At least I didn’t think so. I was trying to advance what you were saying.

I think they both had every right to do what they did AND That they both felt they had no choice to do what they did because nobody else would do it and it had to be done.

What Pam Gellar was trying to accomplish was to show that we will stand up for our First Amendment no matter if we are faced with violence. Nobody has guts to stand up to those terrorists anymore and so she did. Somebody had to.

As far as Trump, again I say, he’s the only one with the guts to stand up to the NWO and take them out and restore a government of the people, for the people, and by the people.

Trump probably regrets now what he said about Gellar. He often says someon the heat of the moment that needs weather next day. But I don’t have a problem with that because that’s what real people who aren’t bought and paid for politicians do.


96 posted on 03/15/2016 9:05:04 AM PDT by uncitizen (Never back down! Never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: silverleaf

Besides, Trump’s disagreeing with Pam Geller’s actions is his exercise to free speech.


122 posted on 03/15/2016 10:03:57 AM PDT by Jay Thomas (If not for my faith in Christ, I would despair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson