She basically dared the terrorists to do violence to her only because they were determined to do so anyway and she stood up to that. but that doesn’t make her Wrong. She was not going to relent her rights no matter what they were going to do to her.
Trumps situation is that he knows he is in danger and as much as he doesn’t want to instigate anyone, he knows he is inasmuch as those who want to stop him are determined to do violence anyway. But he also knows we need to change the direction of the country and that he is basically the only one who can lead that change. So he gets up there every day and talks about it.
Either way, the bad guys are not Pam or a Trump, it’s the people that have got nothing but violence to stop people like you and me from changing this country.
Then what? Then what?
Trump is a business guy. He makes deals. He has to handle adversarial interests and pull out a deal. Maybe both sides get something, maybe just his side wins. I think he tends toward win- win but never Lose.
He already said in the case of Israel vs Palestine that if both sides don't think he is fair, he can't make a deal between them. That's gonna make the hard core on both sides unhappy. But it is speaking real common sense truth
Fact is Gellar doesn't have the goal of being the President of the US of all the people, and of having to bring them together or at worst case, make them safe from each other.
She is an activist, he is a candidate for the US presidency. The U.S. president will never approve of or participate In a stunt to deliberately provoke a religious or ethnic group. Like approving of the Klan sheeting up for a parade. Free speech aye. Useful speech no
That doesn't mean he can or will stop provocative free expression it, but he may criticize it as not useful at best
If his saying so offends a special snowflake as a personal attack, they will just have to tough it out. He isn't going to apologize for hurting their feeeelings