So the protesters inside the venue could be arrested One Hundred Twelfth Congress of the United States of America At the Second Session
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the third day of January, two thousand and twelve H. R. 347
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
2 posted on
03/12/2016 11:16:35 PM PST by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
3 posted on
03/12/2016 11:17:43 PM PST by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Thanks for a more complete explanation!👍🏼
4 posted on
03/12/2016 11:55:24 PM PST by
stocksthatgoup
(GOPe/MSM - "When we want your opinion, we will give it to you.")
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Wouldn’t it be ironic if the protesters (rioters) were undone by Obama?
5 posted on
03/12/2016 11:59:14 PM PST by
Fai Mao
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Whatever, this is becoming a serious problem that needs a real solution. Free speech cannot mean that it is impossible for a candidate to conduct a rally.
In Kansas City yesterday 45 plus minutes were devoted to dealing with disruptions. He barely got 10 minutes to talk.
This is not free speech.
6 posted on
03/13/2016 12:05:00 AM PST by
DesertRhino
("I want those feeble mined asses overthrown,,,")
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
(B)of a building or grounds where the President
or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting; or
(C)of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance; and
(2)the term other person protected by the Secret Service means any person whom the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect under section 3056 of this title or by Presidential memorandum, when such person has not declined such protection.
Section 3056
(7) Major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates and, within 120 days of the general Presidential election, the spouses of such candidates. As used in this paragraph, the term major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates means those individuals identified as such by the Secretary of Homeland Security after consultation with an advisory committee consisting of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the minority leader of the House of Representatives, the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, and one additional member selected by the other members of the committee. The Committee shall not be subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2).
9 posted on
03/13/2016 12:10:12 AM PST by
freepersup
(Patrolling the waters off Free Republic one dhow at a time.)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I have been working on this for a while, and this picture shows the parts I think would apply to Trump protesters with a box around them:

Official functions do not include "purely political party" functions.
12 posted on
03/13/2016 12:28:58 AM PST by
Penelope Dreadful
(And there is Pansies, that's for thoughts. (Ophelia, from Hamlet))
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Here is another resource which explains the individual provisions of 18 USC 1572. At the bottom of each page are arrows to proceed to the next section:
U S Attys Manual
14 posted on
03/13/2016 12:36:43 AM PST by
Penelope Dreadful
(And there is Pansies, that's for thoughts. (Ophelia, from Hamlet))
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
You know, I wonder if this statute could be read a little more broadly, to where the "disruption" of "Government Business" could apply to the Secret Service agents, who are there on scene in the performance of their lawful duties.
As opposed to just disrupting Trump's speech.
21 posted on
03/13/2016 1:58:12 AM PST by
Penelope Dreadful
(And there is Pansies, that's for thoughts. (Ophelia, from Hamlet))
To: ATOMIC_PUNK; All
24 posted on
03/13/2016 8:17:42 AM PDT by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(I think therefore im Dangerous to the liberal agenda !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson