Posted on 03/10/2016 11:52:52 PM PST by RC one
Edited on 03/11/2016 12:00:05 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
I’m saying that there was no outrage then so why is there outrage now? Oh, that’s right-because, in order to support the BS MSM PC narrative, black on white violence needs to be downplayed and white on black violence needs to be overplayed. If the knockout game is a non-issue, this most definitely is.
Well first of all, when the "knock out game" first appeared there was plenty of national attention as black-on-white crime. So there was outrage, but perhaps not in every case. In other words, you're dead wrong. Second, Trump is egging people to get physical at his rallies. So he does earn association with it when such finally transpires. That's news. Deal with it.
This incident at the Trump rally is such a non-issue but it fits the narrative so they're going to make a BFD out of it of course. It will have no effect however. It will not harm Donald Trump. That's the news you're going to need to deal with.
It seems to me that the only folks NOT provoking violence are mad-as-*ell US citizens who have taken it for so long. Is there a message here? Sure is. The party manipulators would be ill-advised to steal the nomination. Anger might be the only thing that wakes them up.
Now I imagine I'll be sparked up for saying this, but the guy didn't deserve to be hit. And the guy who did the sneaky hit - needs to go to jail.
I'm not soft on protesters but the kid should not have been sucker punched. It's just not right.
*****
To get on with this now, let me say that I think that posters Cupcake loves her hunk, Video Doctor and bboop -were on the right track:
( The case could very well be that the very cunning & conniving demorats quite possibly might have schemed up this whole scene /// this could have been a 'setup' by the liberals and this old guy was planted to hit the protester?? // he could have been instructed to sit as close as possible to the aisle, so as to be able to do that 'sucker punch attack' and this 'kid'...was instructed to sit close to the old man, allowing the old man to see when the kid started making his ruckus, and old man knew that the kid would have to be escorted past where he would be waiting/standing /// I think the demorats could very well conjure up this type of scheme...and might try it again, many times /// you never know, just covering all bases /// in fact, I'd say that the Trump security and police in attendance [at all future rallies and town meetings] should have this 'setup' scenario in mind....when having to escort a protester out....making sure to protect via completely surrounding the protester/ protesters while escorting him/her through the crowd on the way out -so they can NOT be attacked/// anyway, just thinkin'....or maybe I'm just all full of it...
[if anyone knows how to get this type 'scenario situation' -given/sent to the Trump campaign, that would be great]
he should get a fine and court costs at most.
As the black comedian George Wallace often says: some people need their ass kicked. So what?
It was just last week that that liberal woman on msnbc, Rachel Maddow, on her program, was saying that the Trump rallies are starting to resemble nazi and/or kkk rallies. (the conniving hag that she is)
These black disrupters come to events looking to create trouble and then whine when they find it
Then you must read this story. After 50 criminal charges and at least two stretches upstate in the pen, this tird dominated the press here by baiting a police into a jaywalking ticket:
http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Jaywalking-Video-Viral-Arrest-371581721.html
Yea, or 16 and 230 pounds of muscle. See you in juvenile court.
walk into a gay bar and start yelling “QUEERS!” and see if you walk out or get carried out. and then see if a judge rules in your defense or rules that you were inciting violence.
What they are doing is against the law. They are trying to stop free speech.. These so called protesters should be in prison.
On MSNBC today, they were making a big deal out of a Breitbart reporter being attacked at a Trump rally. Is this the same issue.
Of course, the talking heads were throwing in their negative buzzwords. Trump rallies are “aggressive”, etc.
Supervillains for Trump should not sucker punch anyone, even if we are flipped off. Further, Supervillains for Trump would NEVER wear a pink shirt.
Easy boy. It was an old man who remembers when such behavior required citizens to make it clear that the asshats were not welcome.
Alas, we have been wimpized/pussified/brainwashed to the point where many think it's a bad thing when citizens help police themselves by making it clear to the true bad guys that they ain't welcome and keeping it up will cause extreme discomfort.
Too many who think they're "staunch conservatives" have missed the process whereby they also became polluted with the metro-sexual crowd that dictates policies like PC and such.
Unassailable logic.
Help me out here! In what way is this different from, or worse than the many black perps who have played the “Knockout Game” on elderly white folks? When the shoe is only briefly on the other foot we hear the perps squealing like stuck pigs.
IMHO the fairest way to process this would be to prosecute both or neither, maybe offering the protester the choice of whether to proceed on that basis. The punch was unlawful but surely so was the protest? Charge the protester with Disorderly Conduct vs and the older fellow with Battery?
Paint me as a ‘metro’ wimp if you like. I’ve put two people in the hospital by the age of twelve. [Both times in self defense.]
But at some point Trump might need to rein in rowdy supporters. This might need to be that time.
I could be wrong, but why take chances at this point?
Worst of all, the man wore PINK!
I am concerned about perception. The old man wore pink. That’s just not right.
No seriously, Beck is already calling us brown shirts. And this ...
How Clintons are behind the Trump KKK/Nazi Smear Campaign
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3406497/posts
‘ ... The [NYT] article reported that Bill Clinton and others argued against those inclined to underestimate Trump ‘that Mr. Trump clearly had a keen sense of the electorate’s mood and that only a concerted campaign portraying him as dangerous and bigoted would win what both Clintons believe will be a close November election ...’
Anti-Defamation League
‘On February 25, the Anti-Defamation League issued a press release in which ADL National Chair Marvin D. Nathan and ADL CEO Jonathan A. Greenblatt called upon Trump ‘to distance himself from white nationalist and former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke, as well as other white supremacists, and publicly condemn their racism’.’
On March 7, Greenblatt’s ADL predecessor Abraham Foxman renewed the attack on Trump, telling Times of Israel reporter Eric Cortellessa that Trump was deliberately inviting his audience to make a ‘fascist gesture’ by raising their hands to pledge to vote for him.
[How the Anti Defamation League is now Clintonista and Soros]
Greenblatt, who recently replaced Abraham Foxman at the ADL’s helm, had previously been described in 2014 by Daniel Greenfield of the David Horowitz Freedom Center as ‘a Clinton official who bummed around NGOs during the Bush years and then became Obama’s director of the White House’s Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation’. Greenfield’s article exposed Greenblatt’s association with the Aspen Institute, funded by former Nazi collaborator George Soros, who had previously been condemned as a bigot by the ADL. In September 2015, Greenblatt had painted Ben Carson as a bigot, saying, ‘Dr. Ben Carson’s statement that a Muslim American should not serve as president is deeply offensive, un-American and contrary to the Constitution.’ In December 2015, after several months of the ADL sparring with Carson, Greenfeld had issued a press release condemning Trump’s call to seal the border against Muslims.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.