Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PAR35
Here's a novel idea, why not just put the A-10 back into production? No need to reinvent the wheel.

31 posted on 03/10/2016 1:13:06 PM PST by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Kartographer

Biggest problem with putting the A-10 back into production; Most if not all the jigs have been scrapped, and the workers who built them have been doing something else for the last 25 (?) years.

Still probably worth doing the estimate for building another 100+ even if the new E model would be able to only have a few parts in common with older models. (Can the marines get one with folding wings and a tailhook painted marine blue?)


37 posted on 03/10/2016 1:35:46 PM PST by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

I thought they destroyed the tooling?


41 posted on 03/10/2016 1:45:51 PM PST by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

Well, step one would be to transfer close air support, together with its budget, from the air force to the army.

Re-draw the rules to give all single and twin engine aircraft not capable of sustained supersonic flight to the army. Air force would retain all current equipment with three or more engines, or capable of sustained supersonic flight.

If that works out OK, eventually transition all transport to the army. That way the fighter jocks could keep their toys, and the heavy bombers.


45 posted on 03/10/2016 1:51:36 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson