Posted on 03/10/2016 6:00:33 AM PST by C19fan
History tells us of countless short men who have achieved greatness. Napoleon. Deng Xiaoping. Voltaire. Ludwig van Beethoven. James Madison.
Psychologists have speculated, perhaps unflatteringly, that their success may be driven by a kind of paranoid complex that makes them overcompensate for what they perceive as disadvantages of their stature by being more aggressive and ambitious than the rest of us.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Is this true for all short men, or only those with small hands? /S
Yes, if a tall person is aggressive he’s an accomplished leader of men. If a short person is identically aggressive, he’s a pit bull who gets a quack-psychology label.
cue randy newman singing.
short people got no reason....
Alan Ladd AKA: Shane (dating myself) did okay. They had him stand on a box next to other stars.
Heightism? Hm, I think I like it. Will that mean looney lefty women will throw themselves at me (5’ 7.5”) to prove they’re not “heightist?” I could live with that!
I think the world record for leaders was actually the Zapotec Indian reform leader in Mexico. Benito Juarez when standing at his tallest was 4 ft. 9 inches.
Amen.
And Beethoven was 5'5". Not exactly tall but with a talent the size of a massif.
“Is this true for all short men, or only those with small hands?”
I may have smallish hands, but I DO have a rather large:
Printer
is this the newest “protected class”...?
“Protected Class”
I highly doubt it..
I’m White, Middle Class, Suburban, Conservative and not ever going to sniff a basketball roster..
You decide - I don’t see any ObamaPhones in my future..
(nor do I want one)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.