Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Brooklyn Attitude
Easy. As they did not protect her privacy in the room video of her being naked is all over the internet.

You've probably seen it I bet.

79 posted on 03/07/2016 4:15:53 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ealgeone

I have

She likes being naked privately

She really dressed down with no makeup all church lady looking for court

If a hotel guy gave the guy a room near hers then there is some liability but they awarded in my opinion around 54 million too much

And that’s being charitable


92 posted on 03/07/2016 4:24:02 PM PST by wardaddy (Ted Cruz endorser of Rubio is off my Christmas list......both beloved by donor class unlike Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: ealgeone

Throw a million on the dresser and tell her to GTFO. This is what the judge should have done. Her “humiliation” is not worth more that half a mil


105 posted on 03/07/2016 4:52:43 PM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: ealgeone

“Easy. As they did not protect her privacy in the room video of her being naked is all over the internet. You’ve probably seen it I bet.”

I know what the violation is, its how she was damaged $55 million is the question. And No I havent seen it.


114 posted on 03/07/2016 5:19:33 PM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (It's the apocalypse, lets have some fun!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson