Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
is that in the article someplace? or is that from some other source???

like i said, i read the article twice before posting and don't see what made them liable...

167 posted on 03/08/2016 4:15:52 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: Chode; nascarnation

Try this.

http://www.9news.com/entertainment/entertainment-tonight/inside-the-erin-andrews-trial-7-most-revealing-things-we-learned/72433572

Link provided by NASCARNATION in post 33.

I had a difficult time understanding why they should be held liable myself. I found it ‘iffy’ at first, but it seems the hotel staff was pretty ‘loose’ with info and some of the staff were up to no good themselves.

Let’s say, If I were on the jury, I would find it a difficult case to decide and probably have to fall back on the side of privacy. The staff should not have been willing to give out information about a guest and especially if the guest is a public figure. They could at least have notified her that this person had requested a room next to her. She could have ‘nipped it in the bud’ if they had. Maybe that is what won her the settlement.


168 posted on 03/08/2016 4:52:05 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson