[UCANSEE2]

Try this.

http://www.9news.com/entertainment/entertainment-tonight/inside-the-erin-andrews-trial-7-most-revealing-things-we-learned/72433572

Link provided by NASCARNATION in post 33.

I had a difficult time understanding why they should be held liable myself. I found it ‘iffy’ at first, but it seems the hotel staff was pretty ‘loose’ with info and some of the staff were up to no good themselves.

Let’s say, If I were on the jury, I would find it a difficult case to decide and probably have to fall back on the side of privacy. The staff should not have been willing to give out information about a guest and especially if the guest is a public figure. They could at least have notified her that this person had requested a room next to her. She could have ‘nipped it in the bud’ if they had. Maybe that is what won her the settlement.

[Chode]

dude... my post was #14!!! and i catch sh!t from people for later posts i never read?

i was simply responding to what was written in the article, and it gave NO background as to why the hotel was liable

journalism 101, who what when where and WHY, guess the author skipped the day they taught that 8^)

[Chode]

from that article, i'd say they are on the hook