Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker

” There was no charging Apple less than others in the agreement with the publishers. “

LOL! Obviously you have not read the agreements nor the court decisions which give explicit examples of same.


14 posted on 03/07/2016 3:49:37 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator
LOL! Obviously you have not read the agreements nor the court decisions which give explicit examples of same.

Look idiot, I've been following this case far longer than you, plus I am an Economist. I know what I am talking about. The publishers were losing money overall because of the predatory pricing being done by Amazon. It was heavily impacting the hard copy books and their own ability to sell to other markets. I've read ever case file on this. The publishers are healthier today and there is more competition than there ever was before. They are all selling eBooks on the Agency model now. . . It's too bad the court system is politicized with Liberal idiots who change the laws at a whim.

The vast majority of eBooks are now selling at lower costs than ever before because of more competition. . . And that is the truth. Amazon is a bad actor in retail at all levels, undercutting prices in every market and frequently selling at a loss. No one can compete with a company that isn't interested in profits.

18 posted on 03/08/2016 1:48:23 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson