“That’s not responsive to the question “
It absolutely is! You asked me to cite a federal statute legalizing same-sex marriage. I posted to you that it is NOT a federal but a state issue.
No, it is not. The US Constitution is not a statute. Again, you demonstrate your ignorance of the LAW. Statutes are laws written by legislative bodies. The Constitution does not meet that definition.
Words mean things, especially in law. . . and you seem to think they don't. . . just like Judge Cote, and the two Justices of the Appellate Court who ignored the definition of a vertical participant and the requirement for use of the Rule of Reason, and the Liberal anti-business members of the newly constituted evenly-divided Supreme Court after Justice Scalia's death who refused Certiorari to this case.