[Gumdrop]

An administration of a Democrat President will NEVER indict Hillary Clinton for anything.

Democrats are liars, they are unpatriotic, they are power hungry, they are big government dictators, they are destroyers of people’s reputations, and many more evil things.

It is not going to happen.

[WENDLE]

I must predict ( I am rather right all the time) that obama will grant clemency to the criminal Clinton stating as follow: “ Hillary has served the country well. This allegations are unproven and ambiguous and of no merit. I want the American people to focus on the first election of a female to our beloved presidency— So I HEREBY GRANT PRE-iNDICTMENT CLEMENCY TO HILLIARY RODHAM CLINTON”. Bookmark this.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Only someone under 40 is so ill informed of history to consider this possible. Ain’t gonna happen.

[MamaDearest]

Perfect political opening (democrat) for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan!!!!!

[hirn_man]

She may be indicted but there will always be at least one Rat on the jury and you don’t go to jail unless all 12 find you guilty.

Hung jury. Every time.

[fortheDeclaration]

Just another rumor.

[Bon mots]

I'll believe it when I see it.

[InterceptPoint]

I’m amazed at the sheer number of un-thinking, kooky responses to your thread. It is actually disheartening. Whatever happened to serious discussion on FR? I think it died.

I doubt if one in a hundred Freepers actually watched the video. Too bad. Their loss. It is, in fact, well worth watching. The only thing it got wrong is the 10 year bit. Hillary could go to jail for 1000 years if convicted for the crimes we already know about. Will she? Probably not. Will she get 10 years? She might. She is certainly eligible.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

... please list one former President of the United States that won while serving jail time ...

Democrats don’t care about electing felons. In fact, it’s preferred.

[Mr Apple]

http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/08/hillary-clinton-refuses-to-apologize-for-laughing-about-12-year-old-rape-victim-she-maligned-in-court/

[Iron Munro]

Hillary will be indicted and tried because her fellow ultra left democrats, Barack
Obama and Loretta Lynch, place honor, honesty and justice above politics.

/s

[for-q-clinton]

Exactly so we can elect a TRUE conservative as opposed to a populist reality TV star.

[DAC21]

Buuuuuwaaaaaaaaahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!

Justice doesn’t happen in Banana Republics. FUBO

[SamAdams76]

Until I see it on Drudge - with the obligatory siren - I’m not getting my hopes up.

[Grampa Dave]

We are ready if and when it happens!

Clinton's server, lies and dishonesty will bite her big butt.

If she stonewalls and does not release the speech transcripts....it enables Republicans to paint her into a corner. This is not just a vast right-wing conspiracy that is causing her problems. She has caused herself these problems. The server is not the vast right-wing conspiracy. It's Hillary Clinton deciding she could put a server in her closet. The same with the transcripts. The same with accepting b anking money in a presidential year when she knew that she was probably going to be running for President.....

[RetiredArmy]

Could be. Could be. I don’t want no could be. I want to see her dragged in and mug shot and finger printed. THEN I will believe something may, and I say MAY, believe something might happen.

[DoughtyOne]

[GLDNGUN]

I have telling my wife and friends for weeks that this would be coming down.

Obama/Jarrett does not want Hillary to be President. They want a hand-picked puppet they can control. Hillary was picked to be SOS to keep her on a leash as long as possible, and for foreign policy failures to fall in her lap.

There is one thing Obama/Jarrett need from Hillary though, and that is her loyal supporters. It can't appear that Obama/Jarrett were behind Hillary's demise, or it would likely rip the democratic party in 2. Many Hillary supporters would not vote in November, or possibly even vote for a Donald Trump; therefore, Obama/Jarrett need the appearance of "clean hands". It must appear that not only did they not encourage an indictment of Hillary but actively opposed it and supported her.

Reading between the lines, you can see the set-up coming:

In October, Obama said in a 60 Minutes interview that Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state didn't pose a national security threat. This was a very public statement to show his "support". Some in law enforcement were upset that Obama had interjected himself into the investigation but Mission accomplished. If he really wanted her to be exonerated why would he risk an apparent conflict of interest by making such a statement?

Obama has met several times privately with Clinton since she started running, which rankled Bernie Sanders because of Obama's perceived support for Hillary in the race when Presidents don't support primary candidates. Mission accomplished.

It upset Sanders to the point that he demanded and got a meeting himself with Obama in late January. He went in wanting an assurance that Obama would "play fair" and not show favoritism or support for Hillary. Sanders left the meeting saying he was sure that Obama would be "even-handed". He was certainly told more than that. He must have been told that Obama would be supporting her publicly but that it would be for public appearances only because Hillary was in deep trouble, legally, and that neither Obama or Sanders should be anywhere near the e-mail scandal when it blows up.

This explains why there was not even a whimper from Sanders when Obama DID publicly endorse Hillary through his press secretary, Josh Ernest, a few days later; otherwise it makes no sense whatsoever. If Bernie was mad about a "perceived" support of Hillary from Obama would he not be outraged at a public support of her? Especially when Obama supposedly told him just a few days before that he would be "even-handed".

Make no mistake, it was a very public endorsement of Hillary from Obama through his Press Secretary. There is absolutely NO way Ernest makes that comment without instructions to do so, even though he tried to downplay as not an official endorsement or something Obama had said. When has a President's Press Secretary EVER revealed his boss's private thoughts or opinions on something that was not for public consumption? Did he have to walk back those comments? No. Did Obama contradict anything his press secretary said? No. Did Sanders say a peep about any of this? No. Mission accomplished.

Now Obama is clearly on the record showing support for Hillary. Hillary is effusive in her praise of Obama, thinking by doing this, she is garnering Obama's continued support. But the rug is about to be pulled from under her.

Sanders thinks he just needs to play along, stay alive in the race and avoid attacking her on the e-mail issue so when she falls the nomination will fall to him. Of course that is exactly what Obama/Jarrett want him to think as they need him to play his part, which is create some opposition to her so the democratic party hasn't already been 100% unified behind her by the time she is indicted.

VP Joe Biden will appear at that time to "save the day" for the democrats, giving them a "mainstream" alternative to Sanders. With Obama's support, Biden will become the nominee. Obama/Jarrett/Biden can say "Hey, we are as shocked and devastated as are all Hillary supporters...but we must come together for the sake of the party and country...we can't let the republicans win!"

Of course, Biden is an absolute clueless idiot, but a useful idiot for the Obama/Jarrett purposes. To get Obama's support he will have to take the Obama/Jarrett hand-picked VP nominee to be on the ticket. Mission Accomplished.

Should Joe Biden somehow be elected...he should sleep with not one eye but with both eyes wide open.

[topfile]

Okay....so there’s this bridge over the Hudson...see..

[Syncro]

It’s going to be difficult, she is watched over and protected by angels.