Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/04/2016 3:51:26 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker

does that mean, theoretically, that someone could see me 25 years ago when I still looked good :)


2 posted on 03/04/2016 4:07:52 AM PST by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

In the beginning. So close to creation. Amazing!


3 posted on 03/04/2016 4:09:42 AM PST by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I think they’re going to find objects much farther away than this, once the James Webb Space Telescope is up and running (around 2018/2019). With its ability to see far into the infrared, I think they’re going to find out that they really have no idea how big, and how old, the universe really is.


4 posted on 03/04/2016 4:49:55 AM PST by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

For some reason my gut feeling is that these calculations of distances in the universe are way off. I’ve no evidence it’s just something nagging in the back of my mind. With all that missing matter and our incomplete knowledge of things certainty is uncertain.


5 posted on 03/04/2016 5:12:36 AM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

bfl


6 posted on 03/04/2016 5:16:58 AM PST by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
One certainly has to take a lot on faith to believe all of the nuances of the Big Bang theory. GN-z11 is so far away that the light from it left 13.3 billion years ago. The laws of physics tell us that mass can't travel faster than the speed of light, yet somehow GN-z11 managed to get that far away from us, even though we started out at the same point at the time of the Big Bang, 13.8 billion years ago.

Oh wait, we can explain that by the fact that during the Big Bang "expansion", the laws of physics didn't apply after all. That explains everything. Then, what laws did apply?

7 posted on 03/04/2016 5:18:39 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

All CGI.


8 posted on 03/04/2016 5:21:18 AM PST by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

They keep changing the earliest time when galaxies formed to match their latest unexpected observation.


10 posted on 03/04/2016 5:24:14 AM PST by DungeonMaster (the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

When the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, electromagnetism and gravity were all one force, the universe expanded faster than the speed of light. This was because there was no such thing as light.

Now nothing can go faster than light. Which means, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. If you could get the band back together you can do whatever you want.

I’m not a scientist but I have the mind of a comic book scientist genius and a comic genius.

By the way. I’m pretty sure Google put the Riddler out of work.


11 posted on 03/04/2016 5:29:07 AM PST by mindburglar (When Superman and Batman fight, the only winner is crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

They say the universe has been expanding since the “Big Bang”. So why when we look at objects from just after the “Big Bang “ are they so far away?


12 posted on 03/04/2016 5:56:19 AM PST by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Seems to be more theory than proof in this article and graphic.

So far, when we build a stronger telescope, we just find more of the same, and haven’t begun to find an indicator of the edge of the universe.


15 posted on 03/04/2016 6:47:48 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson