Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Computer Programmer testifies "US ELECTIONS RIGGED".
Youtube ^ | 09/07/11

Posted on 02/29/2016 2:51:31 AM PST by Enlightened1

Clinton Eugene Curtis, a computer programmer from Florida, testified before a congressional panel that there are computer programs that can be used to secretly fix elections. He explains how he created a prototype for Florida Congressman Tom Feeny that would flip the vote 51%-49% in favor of a specified candidate.

This happened all the way back in 2001 but you might not have heard anything about this claim unless you searched for it. I've seen a Wired News report on this topic and a few local Florida newspaper stories but otherwise, no real media coverage has been provided. You'd think claims of election rigging software would be splattered all over the News yet as it turns out, our news media prefers to point out voting fraud in other nations but not here in THE UNITED STATES.

Mr Curtis a Software programmer who worked for NASA, Exxon Mobil & the US Department of Transportation in a sworn-oath deposition testifies that US elections are rigged by inserting software into the voting system. The timing of this deposition was just after George W Bush being re-elected president of the United States. We are not surprised that this never made it into the main stream media.

Mr Curtis goes on to name US Representatives who attempted to pay him to rig their election vote counts.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: computerprogram; elections; rigged; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: sport

“they will use them in 2016 to put Hillary in the White House.”

I see it as a possibility because “by any means necessary” means exactly what it says. However, I hesitate to think of it as a probability as you have indicated.


21 posted on 02/29/2016 4:12:39 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The problem is the democrats cheat the republicans do nothing about it. Therefore, the republicans are cheaters, too.


22 posted on 02/29/2016 4:13:18 AM PST by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bigtoona

As an election official, you can see if the calibration is off when you turn on the machine and run the test and verify the initial counts are zero. Last election, I took one of our voting machines out of service with no votes because of the calibration. It was off all day. I use a rubber tipped stylus in the center of the button to check the calibration.


23 posted on 02/29/2016 4:19:43 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bigtoona

“Elections should be a manual process with the ballot box”

Really. When I was doing elections, we had good ol’ IBM punch cards. If there were challenges or similar you could pull the precints’ boxes and run the batchs again and/or do a manual re-count. With the new methods there’s no end to the fraud that can be done.

We can thank Gore for the mess we’re in and the hanging chads in FL.


24 posted on 02/29/2016 4:28:23 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Gee whiz Wally, who’da thunk it. Can you say Obama? I knew you could.


25 posted on 02/29/2016 4:28:34 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I’ve known they were rigged for years.
Nothing else would explain how the roll book that I sign every election in order to vote can have my daughter’s signature on the line above mine, since she moved to another state 22 years ago.


26 posted on 02/29/2016 4:35:40 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Slavery will continue to exist and thrive as long a Islam continues to exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

This is why look for special smartphone apps to come out as we get closer to the general that will help folks who have smartphones detect any possible voter fraud.


27 posted on 02/29/2016 4:47:03 AM PST by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Right. Even if the vote rigging had favored Republicans in this instance, it is far more prevalent and systematized in use by Democrats who would not care to jeopardize their operations. I do not expect the Republicans to win the vote count. To do so they would have to have a majority of the popular vote so massive(70% of the legitimate vote or better) that the Democrats would not dare to alter that lest they be all hanged from lamp posts. Anything less will pass because the Republicans WILL NOT protest the rigging formally as they have agreed in court to never question Democrat vote fraud.


28 posted on 02/29/2016 4:50:23 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

George Soros counts the votes for eleven states including New York and Florida.


29 posted on 02/29/2016 4:51:06 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

George Soros counts the votes for eleven states including New York and Florida.


30 posted on 02/29/2016 4:51:18 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

There is zero paper trail for the machines in at least eleven states, the ones for which the votes are counted in Spain by a Soros company. The announced vote tally is all the record that remains.


31 posted on 02/29/2016 4:52:57 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

obama 2012


32 posted on 02/29/2016 4:54:29 AM PST by ldish (Have had enough...you??????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I tecall reporrts of people saying the system switched their votes at the end.

I think this is how Obama won the swcond time


33 posted on 02/29/2016 4:58:15 AM PST by stockpirate (UNLEASH THE TRUMPIAN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 48th SPS Crusader
The difference between traditional fraud and modern fraud is that in the past each machine had to be rigged by someone. It took a lot of manpower. Now whole districts, some whole states, can be rigged by one worker. We should go back to actual ballot boxes and paper ballots. There would still be fraud but it would have much less effect in state and national elections.

I do not understand the machines that show the voter, if he looks, that his vote for xxx actually registered for zzz. If an electronic machine is rigged it surely can be rigged to show the vote entered rather than the one registered.

34 posted on 02/29/2016 4:58:56 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sport

You are right. The powers in charge have got this far with Obama. Do you think any sort of reversal will be allowed to happen?


35 posted on 02/29/2016 5:04:45 AM PST by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

There is another sinister thing that the socialists use is not getting ballots to our active military in time to vote.

It may be a something Trump could address early on to make sure it doesn’t happen again.


36 posted on 02/29/2016 5:08:52 AM PST by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver

Absolutely not!


37 posted on 02/29/2016 5:09:56 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Optically scanned ballots. One scanner per precinct makes it affordable. Inexpensive suitcase tables make it affordably scalable for anticipated voter turnout. Paper ballots make hand recounts both possible and credible.

Touch screen voting was never a good idea because they are the opposite. Expensive machines means too few during anticipated heavy voter turnout periods, and a lack of paper makes a hand recount impossible.

38 posted on 02/29/2016 5:13:24 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Others have said it, it’s conventional wisdom:

If voting mattered, do you think “they” would let us do it?


39 posted on 02/29/2016 5:21:54 AM PST by normbal (normbal. somewhere in socialist occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

There was nothing wrong with that ballot. Persons who can’t operate a push-pin shouldn’t be walking the streets, never mind voting.


40 posted on 02/29/2016 12:37:52 PM PST by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson