The gist of the article is a summary of what appears to be careful sociological research on the effects that a search engine provider can have on preferences by deliberately biasing the search results in favor of one or another side of an issue--think elections. According to the author, the effect is unusually large, and as far as he can tell, legal.
The author lists several of his own experiments, as well as several conducted by Facebook, on the strength of the effect in manipulating users. He claims it is virtually undetectable.
And, for conspiracy theorists, the author notes that Eric Schmidt, ex-CEO of Google, has formed a shadowy company to promote Hillary Clinton's election.
I didn't bother to check if I could excerpt the whole thing, as I think the author deserves web hits for this piece of work.
Startpage.com
Dogpile.
Clear all your cookies.
I was just talking to a guy that had been in Haiti. He said not any electricity or water or plumbing in a lot of places - but everyone gets a free cell phone and their is coverage everywhere. For controlling what the population sees and is told.
Lookit the global islameOluvfest. This is an ancient principality at work.
Why was Henry Fords Cannabis Car scrubbed? Because it didn't enrich satans lil playthings in the ME. Why did Nixon, and Ronnie fail to end our dependence on ME oil? Same reason.
Death and hatred to mankind, poisoning their brainwashed minds.
bookmark
Very dangerous as Google gets about 95% of searches.