Posted on 02/26/2016 9:07:46 AM PST by Kaslin
There's still time to turn it around, of course. But now that many conservatives are moving from the bargaining phase to the depression phase of the Kubler-Ross model, we can begin to grapple with the prospective reality of a Trump-vs-Hillary general election.
Whether you're an ideological conservative, a proponent of limited government or someone who believes that the president has too much power already, you shouldn't think of this matchup as a contest between horrifying candidates. Rather, you should ask yourself which scenario would be more damaging? I'm pretty sure you'd find that Donald Trump is the form of the Destructor.
But Hillary Clinton is the worst, most evil liberal ever!
Yes. You can count on it. Clinton, as you may have noticed, does not have the charisma of Barack Obama. Not only would she be divisive and ethically compromised, but she would also galvanize the Right. Republicans would almost certainly unite against her agenda, which would be little more than codifying Obama's legacy: a collection of policies that half the country still hates.
She won't be able to pass anything substantial. The most likely outcome is another 4 to 8 years of trench warfare in Washington D.C., giving conservatives a pass for a number of winnable, state-level issues. There will probably be, if historical disposition of the electorate holds, a Republican Congress. (Who knows what happens to Congress if Trump is elected.) Hardly ideal. But unless you believe that an active Washington is the best Washington, gridlock is not the end of the world.
The myth that Democrats get everything will persist. But despite plenty of well-earned criticism, the GOP has been a more effective minority party than constituents give them credit for. People are frustrated, but the conservative idealists have been gaining ground since the tea party emerged. The tea party's presence has put a stop to an array of progressive reform efforts that the pre-2010 GOP would surely have gone along with.
Just as some Republicans are already warming to the idea of his candidacy, the temptation in Congress to follow "Trumpism" -- a philosophy based on the vagaries of one man -- will be strong. Trump's inclination is never to free Americans from the state, but rather to do a better job administering the state ("we're gonna take care of everybody!") through great deals and assertive leadership. Or in other words, everything the Founding Fathers didn't want the presidency to be.
So, while gridlock will still hold up most of the issues conservatives care about, chances are high -- considering his long history of supporting big government -- that Trump would try and cobble together a populist coalition for the polices that conservatives hate. This will end up marginalizing ideological conservatism from within the party.
I mean, what will Reaganites gain from this presidency? The idea that Trump could dismantle Obamacare -- when, in reality, he backs many of its components and has yet to offer any genuine solutions -- is a fantasy. The idea that Trump would name originalists to the Supreme Court is equally risible when you consider that Trump has shown absolutely no hint or inclination that he understands what originalism entails.
But the people of the working class are mad! How dare you disrespect their concerns?
There's a difference between caring about the plight of working stiffs and embracing isolationism, high tariffs and other policies that would destroy working class long-term prospects. Is everyone supposed to surrender to mercantilism because it makes 30 percent of angry voters feel better? You can't let a mob run your party. And it's not a mob -- it is hyper-populist or constructed around a cult of celebrity or even because it's angry -- though all those things are true. The problem is that it's incoherent and nihilistic.
It's worth pointing out that the chances of Trump's protectionist policies passing -- with a bipartisan coalition of progressives and right-protectionists -- are far higher under Trump than Clinton. Why should free traders help facilitate this kind of disaster? So they can brag about having a Republican president?
None of this is to argue that the conservative movement or the Republican Party is in good shape, that the status quo is working well or that the leadership doesn't deserve what's coming. I'm not saying someone shouldn't blow up the Republican Party. I'm saying that that someone shouldn't be an unprincipled imposter. Because at some point there's going to be a counterrevolution. Those who swear up and down that they would never vote for Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio because they aren't conservative enough shouldn't be surprised that a large faction on the Right -- more than likely, the larger faction on the Right -- won't support a candidate who is adversarial to its belief system. To support Trump would be an exercise in pure partisanship. For conservatives, it would mean facilitating their own destruction. It makes no sense.
Trump on the other hand, has created his own universe. He is more like Kanye West when he grabbed the microphone away from Taylor Swift.
Remember the momentary shock at his rude behavior?
I don't want to be a part of Trump's bubble.
Yep, he'd make a America great again. Great for Trump.
Can you imagine all the deals he will be able to make for himself?
Looks like the Establishment realizes this morning that their machine gun completely missed the target
The Ministry Of Propaganda is really getting desperate.
The Cheap Labor Express is breathing down their necks to stop the threat to their existence.
Trump will shut them down and they understand that.
Too bad so many fall for their propaganda.
Every time TownWhore.com tries to spike Trump, I become more resolved to back him.
Yes...but will he equal the destruction that took place during the the third reconciliation of the last of the McKetrick supplicants when they chose for him the form of a giant Slor?
Many Shuvs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Slor that day, I can tell you!
In which case you are merely rationalizing a childish fit of spite and ego because your candidate lost in a fake glaze of “principals”
Helping to election a Clinton who is 100% of what you oppose because Trump is not 100% what you want isn’t principal, it childish petulance.
WOW! So, Reagan was an Elitist Globalist Establishment Republican!
Who knew!
This load of excrement is not even worth a cursory glance. I’ll just add David Harsanyi to my list of buttholes to never read again.
“I hate to say it but I’m at that point too.”
Me too unfortunately. And if that’s my choice on election day, I’ll participate in the local elections and write in Donald Duck at the top of the ballot.
“Yup, he’d make America great again. Great for Trump.”
Says the guy with this as his tagline:
“Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz”
oh no, I decided I’ll vote Clowney in Nov because I’ll thoroughly enjoy when he fails miserably and renig on every promise.
The wall will never be built you are delusional it’s a flat out lie
no don’t. if clowny wins please vote for him in november
The best reality show ever will be watching trump come unhinged daily
He is a complete fraud. And all you can do is mock me for my tagline?
Nothing must derail the cheap labor express.
But let’s be honest; tariffs on imports require a congress who will do it. We’ve held our noses for too many open borders liberals with the R after their name, so that’s out the window. NAFTA won’t go away. Etc.
Best we can hope for is no more open borders / trade at the cost of jobs legislation and treaties, and even that is a vague hope with Trump.
I’m honestly only hopeful that a Trump presidency would mean most of the appointed positions in federal government won’t be unfirable crony appointments like we’ve had for the past 24 years. That, to me, is a victory worth fighting for.
And apparently federal employees agree since up to 25% plan on resigning if Trump wins.
“no don’t. if clowny wins please vote for him in november
The best reality show ever will be watching trump come unhinged daily”
Unfortunately it’s not a reality show and our lives will be directly affected. So I won’t participate.
Bingo.
Republicans would almost certainly unite against her agenda, which would be little more than codifying Obama's legacy: a collection of policies that half the country still hates.
Yeah, sort of like they united against BO's agenda when they gained solid majorities in both the U.S. House and Senate, eh?
And the GOPe still can't figure out why so many conservative voters now consider that taking a chance on Trump still seems to be a far less risky proposition than buying that shtick again!
Yeah, ok.
Have Cruzio run on that wacky conspiracy nonsense then.
“Blah, blah, blah....
Written by an establishment guy trying to protect the elites interests through dis-information...”
That is the truth.
Enjoy the Koolaid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.