I always love these "We can get there in X days things. Yes, and the object can wave at Mars as it goes flying by since there's no equivalent system in Mars orbit, or the object of your choice orbit, TO SLOW IT DOWN! :-)
1 posted on
02/24/2016 8:12:54 AM PST by
Freeport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Freeport
Dont need to slow it down, just hop off and parachute in as you fly by.
:)
2 posted on
02/24/2016 8:15:46 AM PST by
samtheman
(Elect Trump, Build Wall. End Censorship.)
To: Freeport
Slowing it down is easy. It’s doing it and staying in once piece that is hard.
3 posted on
02/24/2016 8:16:38 AM PST by
Idaho_Cowboy
(Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
To: Freeport
Powerful Laser Could Blast Spacecraft to Mars in 3 Days QUICK!!! Somebody tell Obama and the Wookie its Air Force One, taking them on another vacation.
Just think, 3 more days, no more Obama...
4 posted on
02/24/2016 8:17:49 AM PST by
mountn man
(The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
To: Freeport
TO SLOW IT DOWN! ......Reverse rockets in the nose or tail? I thought the same thing, and the current velocity in liquid space formula may have to be revised some what.
5 posted on
02/24/2016 8:20:07 AM PST by
Bringbackthedraft
(HILLARY 2016 - SERIOUSLY? What are they thinking? Wuff, wuff?)
To: Freeport
I always love these "We can get there in X days things. Yes, and the object can wave at Mars as it goes flying by since there's no equivalent system in Mars orbit, or the object of your choice orbit, TO SLOW IT DOWN! :-)
6 posted on
02/24/2016 8:20:35 AM PST by
mountn man
(The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
To: Freeport
I always love these "We can get there in X days things. Yes, and the object can wave at Mars as it goes flying by since there's no equivalent system in Mars orbit, or the object of your choice orbit, TO SLOW IT DOWN! :-)They can just step on the brakes.
8 posted on
02/24/2016 8:24:03 AM PST by
Wissa
(Gone Galt)
To: Freeport
3 days to Mars, 6 years to return ...
9 posted on
02/24/2016 8:24:55 AM PST by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: Freeport
I'm sure the mission planners at NASA (in between muslime outreach efforts) have the brains to calculate the retrograde burn necessary to insert the craft into orbit. The gravitational pull of the planet alone might be enough to capture a passing object if it was on the right trajectory and moving at the right speed.
Point is, this has probably occurred to them too.
10 posted on
02/24/2016 8:25:38 AM PST by
IronJack
To: Freeport
It would make a heck of an impact when it lands.
11 posted on
02/24/2016 8:29:11 AM PST by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: Freeport
99% of science headlines with the word “Could” in them are utter fantasy.
Oceans COULD rise ten feet, etc.
14 posted on
02/24/2016 8:34:44 AM PST by
MNDude
(God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat.)
To: Freeport
So we can get Mark Watney his food resupply after all...?
16 posted on
02/24/2016 8:36:59 AM PST by
Jack Hammer
(uff said.)
To: Freeport
Or blast an asteroid out of a collision course with the Earth.
19 posted on
02/24/2016 8:40:28 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Freeport
I’m betting there is an E=1/2 mv2 problem here. Someone should calculate E=1/2 mc2 (Yes George, that is c squared not v squared) for a reasonable payload and see what you get.
It takes a lot of energy to get something going at near light speed.
To: Freeport
What, no URANUS jokes yet? You guys are slippin”!
23 posted on
02/24/2016 8:43:38 AM PST by
V_TWIN
To: Freeport
To: Freeport
“I always love these “We can get there in X days things. Yes, and the object can wave at Mars as it goes flying by since there’s no equivalent system in Mars orbit, or the object of your choice orbit, TO SLOW IT DOWN! :-)”
Another issue. How do you GET BACK?
To: Freeport
I always love these "We can get there in X days things. Yes, and the object can wave at Mars as it goes flying by since there's no equivalent system in Mars orbit, or the object of your choice orbit, TO SLOW IT DOWN! :-)While you're planning the actual mission, send another one of the laser doohickeys on ahead. This also solves the problem of the return trip.
To: Freeport
OF course, to do so, we would need to build a laser array at least 70 square miles. . . for the emitters. Power supply additional.
Minor, unimportant engineering issues. . . (grin)
29 posted on
02/24/2016 9:31:01 AM PST by
Salgak
(Peace Through Superior Firepower. . . .)
To: Freeport
Then fly for another two weeks or so and use Jupiter to slow down
;)
30 posted on
02/24/2016 9:50:46 AM PST by
daku
To: Freeport
"There's no known reason why we cannot do this." F = M a might be one.
ML/NJ
31 posted on
02/24/2016 9:51:04 AM PST by
ml/nj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson