Sure, he’s spoken to a lot of stuff. Doesn’t mean he’s said anything he believes. Almost every position he’s taken has been contradicted within six months, some within just a couple of days.
here you go with the insults again. Anger is pretty obviously in there, non-angry people don’t need to throw insults.
You say I’m throwing insults while you do. If disagreement with your statements is anger in your book, I get it now. Control... Which explains much.
His positions have been in print for decades. The positions on his web site are not written in sand, but concrete, with no change (or legalese word parsing).
So who exactly DO you support? Let’s hear it.