[Alberta's Child]

That is more nonsense talk from you. If you voted for Mitt Romney, a person ineligible to serve as President, you helped to elect Obama. If you voted for John McCain in the primary and/or the general election, you helped to put Obama in office. If you voted for Ronald Reagan and H. George W. Bush, you helped H. George Bush and George W. Bush to become President, which made it possible for Obama to become President. If you voted for Richard Nixon, you helped John Ford and Jimmy Carter to become President. If you voted for any of those Presidents, you helped a number of their social welfare policies and the justices they appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court to wreck the Constitution. The long long list goes on. Meanwhile, you propose to continue the corruption by your support of Ted Cruz, who along with his father have a history of lies, deceit, and unethical conduct. So, don't tell me I have no way of knowing who and what you voted for, when it plainly obvious few people who have ever voted for a Republican or a Democrat can escape being associated with some degree of responsibility for allowing their corrupt leadership to remain present in the U.S. Government.

I have never voted for any of the individuals you have listed here. So your description of my statement as "nonsense talk" is irresponsible and idiotic. On that basis alone I have no interest in wasting my time with you.

You are falsely portraying Associate Justice Antonin Scalia and his position.

How can I possibly be "falsely portraying" Justice Scalia and his position when I quoted from his own dissent in one of those cases? Did Justice Antonin Scalia falsely portray himself and his position on these matters?

You sound like someone who thinks we haven't had a legitimate form of government in years ... probably since the Whiskey Rebellion in the early 1790s. Even if you're right, you're probably wasting your time here on FreeRepublic because there's no cure for that.

[WhiskeyX]

“I have never voted for any of the individuals you have listed here. So your description of my statement as “nonsense talk” is irresponsible and idiotic. On that basis alone I have no interest in wasting my time with you.”

You want to pretend its nonsense, but you are still a participant in allowing the corruption to take place even if you never voted for a Democrat or Republican President. By voting for candidates in other political parties you have contributed to the election victory of one of the Democrat or Republican candidates by withholding your vote from the losing Democrat or Republican candidate. So, unless you are a foreign citizen, you cannot escape some form of responsibility for the presence of those U.S. leaders in the U.S. Government, even if you never vote at all.

“How can I possibly be “falsely portraying” Justice Scalia and his position when I quoted from his own dissent in one of those cases? Did Justice Antonin Scalia falsely portray himself and his position on these matters?”

Evidently you are too dense to understand the English language, understand how to write a theme paper, or even read a publication with cited sources. Otherwise, you would understand there is no way Associate Justice Antonin Scalia would go around denying Blackstone’s Commentaries and the Roman law were a part of U.S. jurisprudence. It really is a stupid position for you to be taking, and that is putting it very very mildly.

“You sound like someone who thinks we haven’t had a legitimate form of government in years ... probably since the Whiskey Rebellion in the early 1790s. Even if you’re right, you’re probably wasting your time here on FreeRepublic because there’s no cure for that.”

You sure do live in some kind of make believe fantasy like Alice in Wonderland. Try cracking open Black’s Law Dictionary and try explaining when the Roma law inside that publication ceased to be used by the U.S. Supreme Court.