Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Dumping one provision of the Constitution because someone deems it irrelevant in the modern age opens wide the door to dumping other provisions of the Constitution because someone thinks they are irrelevant in the modern age.


47 posted on 02/21/2016 5:19:25 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sonoIt is always better to stay away from the Gainesville area feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus

I get that. I wouldn’t dump anything. For the “natural born citizen” requirement, I believe a Constitutional amendment to change it — or at least clarify it — is in order.


49 posted on 02/21/2016 5:25:24 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Bye bye, William Frawley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: arthurus

I’d also suggest that changing provisions of the Constitution related to procedural and governing matters is far less benign than changing provisions of the Constitution that reflect inalienable rights.


50 posted on 02/21/2016 5:31:38 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Bye bye, William Frawley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson