To: PROCON
My very dead fur coats don't shed. Look at that picture. It sure looks like a setup. What's that fur all over the place hiding the true outline of the critter.
Starved to death....An excellent assumption by an environmental activist....for his new book.
To: Sacajaweau
My very dead fur coats don't shed. Look at that picture. It sure looks like a setup. If the fur had been plucked out by birds or foxes, etc. while feeding on the corpse then it would have been scattered more randomly.
It's nice the way it all fits neatly within a 16:9 TV frame!
To: Sacajaweau
My very dead fur coats don't shed. Look at that picture. It sure looks like a setup. What's that fur all over the place hiding the true outline of the critter. That was my first thought, too. The corpse is just a little too neat and tidy. What? There's no wind up there to blow the fur around. It's just nice and neat and clean and sprinkled evenly around the *corpse*.
Wouldn't the fur of a dead animal be dirty and covered with the nastiness that a rotting body would cover it with?
51 posted on
02/19/2016 4:28:21 AM PST by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson