To: DiogenesLamp
From your link: "The iPhone is the property of the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health where the attacker worked"
So, in this case, the phone belongs to a third party - government, no less. I see no reason why they shouldn't be able to see what's in it. If only all public "servants" were held to the same standard...
38 posted on
02/17/2016 9:42:29 PM PST by
Sicon
("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
To: Sicon
So, in this case, the phone belongs to a third party - government, no less. I see no reason why they shouldn't be able to see what's in it. If only all public "servants" were held to the same standard... One could even say that Apple was refusing to cooperate in the return of stolen property, meaning the information contained on that phone before the terrorist stole it. :)
That is, one could say this if one wanted to be a legal technicality hair-splitting Son of a B*tch.
44 posted on
02/17/2016 9:53:07 PM PST by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: Sicon
"From your link: "The iPhone is the property of the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health where the attacker worked"Exactly. And how much of this info is already in their iCloud account anyway? It's not Silicon Valley but surely San Bernardino had some sort of backup protocol.
84 posted on
02/18/2016 2:40:10 AM PST by
StAnDeliver
("Sweet, sweet tears ..")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson