Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sicon
So, in this case, the phone belongs to a third party - government, no less. I see no reason why they shouldn't be able to see what's in it. If only all public "servants" were held to the same standard...

One could even say that Apple was refusing to cooperate in the return of stolen property, meaning the information contained on that phone before the terrorist stole it. :)

That is, one could say this if one wanted to be a legal technicality hair-splitting Son of a B*tch.

44 posted on 02/17/2016 9:53:07 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Don’t get me wrong, I am all for protecting privacy, and do not think Apple should just allow the government to randomly access people’s phone data (they already gather everything you text, browse, email, say, etc. anyway though). But when someone is charged with a crime, and are the subject of an investigation, I think there are some legal grounds for getting a warrant to search the phone. Not sure how it’s any different than getting a warrant to search someone’s house or car...


105 posted on 02/18/2016 4:16:03 AM PST by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson