Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut

Thank you for perfectly highlighting my point. Those associations you dismiss so easily are hundreds of thousands of dollars put forth to fund the 2006 Democrat takeover of Congress, to name one example. I don’t find your apathy amusing or rational. I’m more than bothered by the fact that the so-called frontrunner for the Republican nomination consulted his favorite President, Bill Clinton, before announcing his 2016 bid knowing he cut a check for 100k to their foundation and has a history of supporting her NY Senate campaign and endorsed her in 2008. I don’t want a Republican nominee with a great relationship with the Democrat Party establishment. Your attacks on the other hand are ad hominems; baseless and vague appeals to “lies” without offering up examples or dire warnings about “dirty tricks” having failed to produce those either. This is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. You want to troll for Trump without resistance but I’m will confront you at will.


105 posted on 02/16/2016 10:06:13 PM PST by A Conservative Thinker (Ted Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: A Conservative Thinker
Yeah. We get what your are saying.


106 posted on 02/16/2016 10:08:13 PM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media. #2ndAmendmentMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: A Conservative Thinker
ACT wrote [on wanished thread]: There is absolutely no comparison between Donald Trump and Ronald Reagan.

You got that right.

Though they both started as Democrats, Trump became a billionaire.

I think he scored one more ex-wife, too. Plus, Trump's kids aren't mostly clot-heids.

108 posted on 02/16/2016 10:09:31 PM PST by kiryandil ("Our Muslim-In-Chief, Barack Obama - the Quislaming in the White House")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: A Conservative Thinker

You’re not doing yourself any favors with your snippy remarks.

Not very friendly.....nope!


109 posted on 02/16/2016 10:10:22 PM PST by Guenevere (If.the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: A Conservative Thinker

“I’m will confront you at will.”

That sounds like either a subtitle from a Japanese movie or Mr. D warning the Red Dragon that he really likes the cute little blind lady.


110 posted on 02/16/2016 10:11:46 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all sarmed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: A Conservative Thinker; reaganaut
Your attacks on the other hand are ad hominems; baseless and vague appeals to "lies" without offering up examples or dire warnings about "dirty tricks" having failed to produce those either. This is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. You want to troll for Trump without resistance but I'm will confront you at will.

You might want to brush up on your English sentence construction a little, ACT. I detect a little "lack" in same...

111 posted on 02/16/2016 10:12:10 PM PST by kiryandil ("Our Muslim-In-Chief, Barack Obama - the Quislaming in the White House")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: A Conservative Thinker

I’m not aptathetic, I just don’t believe your ‘documentation’ when other documentation that has been vetted proves you wrong. You are the one that started the ad hominems.

I do not see Cruz as Savior (I have one thank you) and I do not like his misuse of Scripture and conflation of politics and faith to get votes. Cruz doesn’t walk the walk of a Christian while he runs as the “ONLY CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVE” and frankly I liked Cruz more before people like you started acting like jack***es on FR.

Dirty tricks - let’s see -shaming mails, fraudulent mails in Tx, lies about outher candidates...I can go on. And having Crazy Beck doesn’t help his cause.

I’m not trolling for Trump. I am having fun trolling you though and you are letting me. LOL

BTW, you haven’t been her long enough to know me to call me apathetic. Back off noob.


119 posted on 02/16/2016 10:16:08 PM PST by reaganaut (Insert tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: A Conservative Thinker; reaganaut; E. Pluribus Unum
To quote a great mind on [wanished] thread:

Phyllis Schlafly doesn't endorse Democrats, Skippy.

Owww! THAT'S gonna leave a mark! :)

124 posted on 02/16/2016 10:17:50 PM PST by kiryandil ("Our Muslim-In-Chief, Barack Obama - the Quislaming in the White House")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: A Conservative Thinker
 photo rkudqd.jpg
130 posted on 02/16/2016 10:21:42 PM PST by reaganaut (Insert tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: A Conservative Thinker
 photo rediculous.jpg
134 posted on 02/16/2016 10:22:23 PM PST by reaganaut (Insert tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: A Conservative Thinker

Yet you’re fine with the fact that Clinton reassured Jeb! that Trump would be out sometime during the debates?

Jeb! is deeper in bed (gag) with the Clintons than any of them.


159 posted on 02/16/2016 10:36:21 PM PST by Marie (TRUMP TRUTH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson