Replies

Ted Cruz did not get into Princeton because he was insider, while there he did not win the national debate championship because he was insider, he did not get into Harvard Law school because he was an insider, while there he did not get on Law Review because he was insider, he did not get a job in the Bush administration because he was an insider and while there earn such a reputation as to be able to go on to become solicitor general in Texas. While solicitor general in Texas, he did not win a series of Supreme Court cases because he was insider.

When a lawyer enters a courtroom he does not do so as an insider he does so as an advocate who is on equal footing with his adversary. There is no such thing as insidership in that venue unless it is corrupt.

When Cruz entered the Senate he did so as an advocate against adversaries, the adversaries were your enemies and mine and he fought them on our behalf. Mere occupancy of the building does not make one an insider in the Senate anymore than it does in the court room.

For Trump supporters to accuse Cruz of being an "insider," indeed the "consummate" insider is stunning hypocrisy when they support a man who admits to bribing politicians in order to get favors. Donald Trump brided his way inside!

Why do Trump supporters project the very sins of their man onto every other candidate?

Cruz's father did abandon the family for a time, he did suffer financial loss as a result of his drinking, and Cruz's father did start out very poor in America.

How much did Trump inherit from his father? Did Trump use his father's banking and political connections to advance his real estate adventures? Of course he did. Trump was born on third base and thought he hit a triple.

You cannot answer a simple question: Name ONE job that Ted Cruz, as an adult, has held that was not connected to politics? ONE.

You have not refuted a single point of mine. Lot’s of word no substance, typical of nathanbedford.