Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Reddy
It seems that Steven was the only suspect during the original investigation, and all evidence was procured to produce his guilt.

Well, let's see why that was, shall we?

He is known to have been one of the last people to speak with her despite his inept attempts to hide his identity behind his sister's ad-buy and the *67 feature of his phone. [Guess he didn't know the phone company would still be able to identify the call.] His junkyard is the last place where she was known to be alive. She was never seen again by anyone after going there. Her vehicle was discovered on his property -- NOT by the police that he claims were framing him -- but by a civilian volunteer walking the property in the aftermath of her disappearance.

We can go into the overwhelming forensic evidence against him if you want, most of which was not covered in the progtard "documentary."

And we can consider his own chilling words, told to his ex, who asked NOT to be included in the documentary, but who -- to the lasting shame of the filmmakers -- was included anyway: "All b!tches owe me."

Yeah. A very, very sweet, innocent, man. Butter would not melt in his mouth.

6 posted on 02/02/2016 10:17:20 PM PST by FredZarguna (You did not see what I did there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna

IDK, but I do know that I would want to be considered innocent until proven guilty BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. It appears that did not happen in this case.

He was the last person to speak to her. So what? He admits that on camera. If you murdered someone, wouldn’t you say, hey, I haven’t seen (murdered person)? And so what that he called her. This was before smart phones, and he was trying to ascertain when she would come so he wouldn’t be waiting all day for her to arrive. Ever wait all day for a repairman to come? And so what that he *67 his number. Maybe he thought she was avoiding his calls while he waisted his time all day waiting for her to come. It’s all so easy to dismiss. It does not point to murder. And yes, her vehicle was discovered on his family property *by one of her relatives* **after her car was reported to have been seen by a LEO** There are just too many what the hecks in this case, and too many issues that don’t add up to reasonable doubt. The, “All b’s owe me!” statement? He’s not a Casinova , that’s for sure. But that doesn’t prove he committed murder.


10 posted on 02/02/2016 10:26:21 PM PST by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: FredZarguna

Great summary.


29 posted on 02/02/2016 11:52:56 PM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson