[justlittleoleme]

Trump ;)

[onona]

If they one, I’d want O’Malley

[Olog-hai]

NOTA. Nobody should be allowed to run from the openly-socialist wing of the Uniparty.

[biff]

I actually think Hillary would be the easiest to beat. She has so much baggage she needs a 3 ton forklift to carry it. Lots and lots of targets.

[TexasCruzin]

Not a damn one!

[TexasCruzin]

Not a damn one!

[bgill]

Uncle Teddy

[Flatus I. Maximus]

Oh, it’s got to be BERNIE. It’s time for the Democrats to stop pretending they’re not Communists and stand up for what they truly believe.

[knarf]

M.O’M

[Tennessee Nana]

O’Malley...not that I would want him to win..

the Democrats have more of a chance with him than Bernie who will implode before the summer is out..

the D convention will be fun !!!

[Suz in AZ]

MOM

[Balding_Eagle]

Hillary, and I am praying she is not indicted.

I want Trump to beat the living sh*t out of her first.

Then, a year from now, turn the FBI lose on her.

[ek_hornbeck]

Bernie, because he has a basically zero chance of winning in a general election. His brand of European-style socialism doesn't have much appeal except with on college campuses - the 40% of Democratic primary voters are more or less his ceiling. In contrast, Hillary's brand of crony capitalism seems to sell well enough to people who call themselves "moderates" (at least her husband's pitch of it did), and unlike Bernie, who's considered an eccentric oddity by the RNC, Hillary has the full support of every party machine and super-PAC.

There's an additional reason I'd rather have Bernie as the DNC nominee. He's wrong on just about every issue, but he's not the sleazy crook that Hillary is. I just can't muster the visceral hatred towards him that I have towards Hillary.

[Hugin]

Bernie. Better a deranged socialist than a dangerous sociopath.

[Personal Responsibility]

Hillary is the most beatable candidate. For that reason, I’m hoping it’s her. Everyone who doesn’t recognize that Sanders inspires the same passion that Obama did simply isn’t paying attention. A Sanders candidacy could EASILY result in a Sanders Presidency which is disaster.

[Fresh Wind]

Which one will appeal most to the free **** army?

I’m guessing Burnout Sanders would be the one.

So it’s Hillary for me!

[mountainlion]

50 years for Hillary.

[ek_hornbeck]

I think the bigger question is who the DNC will back if Hillary is indicted or is otherwise proven to be damaged goods. I don’t think they’ll allow Bernie to be their standard-bearer: the crony capitalist wing of the party doesn’t like him and he’s unelectable. They’ll push for someone “safe” like Biden in a brokered convention.

[Pollster1]

If the usurper is not replaced by a conservative, I no longer care who is next. America will not survive as a free country unless we quickly start rolling back the encroachments on freedom from these eight terrible years. We can openly declare we are socialist under Bernie, we can rapidly move toward an all-powerful dictator under Hillary, or we can watch freedom wither and die under Jeb/Christie/Rubio/Kasich, but it doesn’t matter which one of those paths we choose, since the destination is the same.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum.”
(If you want peace, prepare for war)
- Vegetius

I want peace . . . but I want full freedom, with all of our God-given rights that are enumerated in the Bill of Rights even more.

[Pravious]

I’m rooting for Hillary.

I’m so scared that half our country has been dumbed down by the “educational system” and media that they’re willing to sell out America entirely and turn the country communist, just so they could get “free stuff” from Uncle Bernie.

I like to think there’s enough functioning brain cells in many leftist’s brains to dimly perceive that Hillary is an unreliable, lying, corrupt has-been. Many will vote for her - but I just can’t see the enthusiasm being there. Consequently, I think we’re more likely to win against her than against the socialist pig.