No, I don't. But it happens all too frequently under dubious circumstances, and this incident is no different than other ones. And I have no doubt this will be found to be justified as so many of the others have.
This will be found? Without audio? With obvious proof that there was no medical attention there? Without an autopsy?
Ad populum is a fallacy. As so many others have projected their own wants on the situation, without video from the front, and, audio.
He may just as well have been simply reaching for his wound. Further, with 3 weapons found in his truck, he may actually have been unarmed...and a weapon conveniently found on him later or simply stated to have existed.
His hands were up. UP. They shot him anyway. They murdered this man and intended to in the first place. It’s why they even had someone in the trees.
They shot him in the back.
You go ahead and defend the shoot. You also defended the decision against the Hammonds: the last ranch standing out there-perhaps to be mined for uranium to enrich H3ll, Wyden, and the Governor’s pockets-or even 0bama’s “flexibility.”