Posted on 01/26/2016 8:31:42 AM PST by conservativejoy
Fools like you just love playing the fallacy of the undistributed middle.
Very silly in light of what the truth is regarding Clinton.
This is a non-factor to the average voter. To Evangelicals, I’m quite certain they’ve already made their choice.
Authentic vices or pretended virtue? Hmm, which one, which one?
I’ll vote for either of these guys, but I’m not going to die on hill for them.
I’ll enjoy voting for Trump. Cruz, well, I’ve voted for worse. I also think a Cruz vote is academic.
Since we are discussing religion and morality, Do you think GOD was mad at Cain for killing Abel, or for lying about it ?
If Cain was then such an immoral person, does it bother you that he is probably your ancestor ?
You really have a strange understanding of the Bible... But to answer your last question, ALL of our ancestors were immoral by nature, as they all had a sin nature. No one is perfect, and I don't even expect Trump to be perfect. But a man who strives to be moral at least attempts to live by God's law -he does not revel in breaking God's law, publicize it to the world and then claim to be moral.
ok, I’m seriously not trying to pick a fight, just trying to umake sure I’m reading it correctly, He took her to Paris when she was 9?
Trump is a pig, always has been and always will be. His respect for women probably isn’t much higher than Bill Clinton’s is. Yet people are not voting for a prude-in-chief.
Trump’s wife was a nude model. The moral compass of this nation is already off. Just more of the same or worse?
Eight years of Bill Clinton knocked the presidential moral compass completely out of whack. And given Trump's marital track record I wouldn't expect his current wife to make it through his first term.
God often uses flawed men to achieve His will. David, Moses, Saul of Tarsus...
Got that. Thanks for clarifying your stance.
We (the sheeple in your mind) of open minds not yet settled on a specific candidate, cannot be trusted with any news other than slavish reports of Donald Trump. Again, got it!
Donald's and Ted's personal life is not what I care about, I care about what they will do to reform the government.
at some point this became a politically correct dispute rather than real science given the span of time between generations.
It is akin to the fashion of being ancestry DNA tested which real science says does not say much.
Think of the scam of naming a star and recording it in “book form” at the copyright office. It is not official just a page in a copyrighted book.
That said a salacious comment about long dead people sells books.
“Ted set up his own law firm and employed people?”
Changing the goalposts again.
First it was has Cruz created jobs. The answer is yes, so it becomes did he start his own law firm.
Trump created a lot of jobs with the Apprentice franchise, but he did not start his own production company, a preexisting production company does that.
I don’t really understand your argument.
Reagan didn’t create many jobs in his private life. Mitt Romney created a lot, more than Trump with his venture money.
So does it go: Romney > Trump > Reagan?
I don’t think so.
Who cares? I’m not voting for saint...I’m voting for PRESIDENT and all humans sinned.
Ronald Reagan managed a large, multi level management position group of folks, under his tenure as SAG President.
He also owned a WORKING ranch....and, that requires covering a payroll for the many he employed.
The Trump organization employs over 22,500 people.
We want the next president to undo as much as he can of government intrusion, and Ted hasn’t done enough in life to even know what that intrusion is to a great extent.
Trump does.
We had a divorced president - Ronald Reagan!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.