Posted on 01/22/2016 1:56:47 PM PST by BBell
Video at link.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
5:03
BTW, I know this was meant to be propaganda by the LGBT.
“Gay parents?”
Contradictory.
You cannot be “gay” and have children.
I’ve got a girlfriend.
WELL SHE BETTER NOT BE BLACK.
and then it gets “worse”.
funny
I like that gf was a Republican. :)
I know a gay guy from my highschool days that has two bio kids. And the kids’ biological mom/mom they grew up with is a lesbian!
Interesting “Production”.
It’s actually conservative propaganda.
A weak attempt to point out the hypocrisy of the LGBT/leftist community.
“Dads, I just like the idea of poop on my d***.”
I know a guy who adopted two kids with his wife. He then dumped the wife for a dude. He fought to get custody.
He’s now on live-in boyfriend number 8 - maybe 10. I don’t know exactly.
The kids are totally screwed up.
Enjoyed it! Thanks
Gays can also have children by artificial reproductive technologies, ---artificial insemination, IVF, surrogacy---just like many straight people do.
This is morally offensive whether straight or gay people do it, but they do it.
ROTFLMAO!!!
Oh, that was funny as hell!!!
> “You cannot be “gay†and have children.”
I once was inclined to believe that was true. But then I learned that homosexuals have a network where homosexual men donate sperm to lesbians who undergo insemination.
The takeaway is that homosexuals hate heterosexuals and believe heterosexuals are not needed to create children.
They think their children can be programmed to accept homosexuality as normal, and heterosexuality as abnormal.
Children of homosexuals will grow up having heterosexual instincts and feel they must keep it secret.
Bizarro world I know. But now you know. Spread the word.
How is surrogacy , IVF, or insemination morally offensive?
You cannot have a child without both sexes.
Children in this situation are nothing more than a feel good experiment to further promote a way of life that is in no way conducive to the human race.
Thanks for asking. To start, let me just quote your own words back to you:
"Children in this situation are nothing more than a feel good experiment to further promote a way of life that is in no way conducive to the human race."
I realize that you weren't talking about he "experiments" of surrogacy, IVF, and insemination there --- you were talking about the "experiment" of mainstreaming homosexual parenting. However, the same goes for the whole overarching project: the deconstruction of sex. That is, breaking apart of male and female, sex and gender, intercourse and fertility, structure and function, into fragmentary piecs, and then cobbling them together again into some different design as to ourselves seems most useful.
The artificial human reproduction technologies are morally flawed because they separate the act of marital lovemaking from the conception of the child. It is not a healing, but a replacement of the human design itself. It splits sex off from procreation, leaves it out of the fertility equation. This renders the sexual act insignificant and inconsequential and transfers the real significance and consequence to a laboratory production process and a commercial transaction.
A laboratory production process and a commercial transaction --- as the "sources" of human life --- always push us further toward dehumanization. A road we have already wandered off on, and have traversed to our dire peril.
Separating sex away from fertility is alwaus wrong for humans, because for us it always radically alters the significance of our own embodied being. It "says," and very clearly, that embodied sacred fertile union --- lifemaking lovemaking --- can be replaced by something else, without any loss to our humanity. This is a huge detour down the wrong road.
It's OK for animals --- breeding pedigreed dogs or race horses or optimal dairy cattle. It is intrinsically a veterinary practice.
You yourself can see how these veterinary technologies mirror the unnaturalness of disordered gay intercourse. These technologies are the perfect "gay sex" reproductive fix. It is just another part of the long historic/demonic process of the deconstruction of sex into separately exploitable parts and pieces, to be pried apart and then mixed and matched not according to the Divine design, but by our own preference.
People who have medical fertility problems -- my heart goes out to them --- and I would urge them to seek true healing solutions which respect and restore the sexual one-flesh nature of human procreation. One place to start is Natural Procreative Technology: NaProTech (LINK)
Hope for the infertile.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.