To: BenLurkin
BS!! They just want to save money!! Who knows how long an elderly person might live with treatment?? Welcome to Gov’t Health Care! Where only those who the Gov’t deems worthy will get treatment!
2 posted on
01/21/2016 7:07:42 PM PST by
originalbuckeye
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: originalbuckeye; All
3 posted on
01/21/2016 7:11:49 PM PST by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: originalbuckeye
The algores and zuckerbergs of the world will continue to get these screenings. No matter what “guidelines” are promulgated by the nanny state.
Count on it.
4 posted on
01/21/2016 7:11:57 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: originalbuckeye
I have always found it amazing how medical studies line up with payment options by insurers.
Physicians can be sheep.
I read the study. It said that screening did not decrease overall mortality.
Not that screening did or did not decrease mortality in the area of screening interest.
Overall mortality
which could have many many confounding factors.
5 posted on
01/21/2016 7:12:10 PM PST by
Chickensoup
(ISIS is like Marxism, not a country, but a dangerous sociopolitical philosophy)
To: originalbuckeye
At 63, my prostate cancer would’ve killed me in a year or less. The PSA test saved me. Old people are becoming disposal.
9 posted on
01/21/2016 7:48:53 PM PST by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
