Skip to comments.
Byron York: What Palin does for Trump, and to Cruz
Washington Examiner ^
| 1/20/16
| Byron York
Posted on 01/20/2016 7:34:16 AM PST by LesDowrey
AMES, Iowa -- In September, when Donald Trump appeared before a giant rally in Dallas, a person in the Trump circle described the coming months of the campaign. Sure, a big event like Dallas got headlines, but Trump knew he couldn't do the same rally, rally, rally for the next several months and expect the public to remain interested. Even then, TrumpWorld was planning a varied (and secret) schedule of special events, bold policy rollouts, and other attention-getting gestures to keep the voters' and the media's attention over the course of a long campaign.
Tuesday night in Ames was a prime example of Trump's timing and showmanship. Bringing Sarah Palin to Iowa grabbed all eyes in the Republican caucus race. And it seriously undercut the notion, growing in some political circles, that GOP rival Ted Cruz has nailed down the support of all of Iowa's conservatives.
Palin, whose last highly-publicized visit to Iowa was a poorly-received speech at Rep. Steve King's candidate summit in January 2015, was her most Palinesque self. Discussing who is and who is not a conservative, for example, she said, "How about the rest of us? Right-winging bitter clinging, proud clingers of our guns, our God, our religions, and our Constitutionâ¦" At other times, her style was her own brand of lyricism: "We all have a part in this, we all have a responsibility, looking around at all of you, you hard-working Iowa families, you farm families and teachers and Teamsters and cops and cooks, you rock 'n' rollers and holy rollers, all of you who work so hard, you full-time moms, you with the hands that rock the cradle, you all make the world go 'round, and now our cause is one."
But Trump was happy to have Palin for more reasons than her ability to entertain a crowd. Even though she is much diminished from her heyday a few years ago, Palin still has influence among some conservatives. Trump now has that on his side, and just as important, Cruz doesn't.
At the rally I talked with Jamie Johnson, a veteran Iowa politico who supported Rick Santorum in 2012 and Rick Perry earlier in this race, but is now unaffiliated. Johnson saw the Palin move entirely in terms of persuading voters at the margins of the Trump vs. Cruz contest.
"I think the Palin endorsement is important for all of the Tea Partiers who were deciding which of the two they were going to vote for," Johnson said.
Does Palin still have clout in Iowa?
"To Tea Partiers, she does."
"How big a part of the electorate is that?"
"Probably 15 to 20 percent of the people who caucus. I'd say 15 to 20 percent would identify themselves as Tea Partiers more than anything else, such as born-again evangelicals."
"And you would expect that some of them are caught on the fence now between Trump and Cruz?"
"I know for a fact that they are," Johnson replied. "I've talked to several people in the last two months who have been on the fence between Trump and Cruz. So if they're on the fence, this might be just enough to push them over."
Indeed, at Trump and Cruz events in the last two weeks, I have met plenty of people who were for Trump, with Cruz as their second choice, or were for Cruz, with Trump as their second choice. For some of them, Palin's seal of approval might make some difference. Before she spoke, I asked several people at the Ames rally whether Palin had worn out her welcome; none thought she had.
"It's a valuable endorsement because people still view her as an anti-establishment outsider who they can also relate to," said Craig Robinson, a former Iowa state GOP political director who founded the Iowa Republican blog. "And if there is any strategy to the Trump campaign, it is to dominate the media coverage of the race, and Palin's endorsement will certainly help with that."
That's an understatement. Palin's appearance with Trump immediately captured nearly all the media's attention. In coming days, it will inspire impassioned debate, make talking heads explode, and cause fevered speculation across cable TV.
In Iowa, though, some in the Cruz camp were almost relieved to see Palin get so much attention, because it directed coverage away from a potentially far more serious problem for Cruz. Just a few hours before Palin appeared Tuesday, Iowa Republican Gov. Terry Branstad, a hugely influential figure in the state, publicly said he wants Cruz to lose in the caucuses. Branstad, a supporter of ethanol, made the statement at a renewable fuels conference; Cruz, of course, opposes the federal ethanol mandate. "[Cruz] hasn't supported renewable fuels, and I think it would be a big mistake for Iowa to support him," Branstad said.
That hurts.
In the early hours of Tuesday, before the Branstad and Palin developments, the Cruz camp felt things were going pretty well. They believed Cruz had gotten the upper hand in his feud with Trump over constitutional eligibility, "New York values," and other topics. CruzWorld pointed to talk radio hosts criticizing Trump as proof that Cruz had come out ahead. "Mark Levin just erupted at [Trump], and Rush did as well," a Cruz aide said Tuesday morning. "When they say 'cut the crap,' it has a pretty powerful effect." (In fact, Limbaugh's objection to Trump was a bit more nuanced than that, but Cruz still counted it as a victory.)
In a morning conversation, one Cruz aide expressed confidence that Cruz could counter any attack Trump threw at him. Cruz can fight as long as he needs to, the aide suggested: "It's going to stop when Trump wants it to stop."
That good feeling disappeared quickly as Tuesday went on. A few hours later, Iowans were talking about Branstad, and then everybody was talking about Palin.
And on Palin, one final, indirect effect of her endorsement is that the Cruz camp is left to wonder what Trump has coming up next. "He has to have another couple of tricks up his sleeve before the caucuses," said one Cruz supporter over drinks late Tuesday. The problem is that Team Cruz doesn't know what those tricks are. They'll find out when Trump wants them to.
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: cruz2016; donaldtrump; elections; gop; immigration; palinendorsestrump; repositorytrump; sarahpalin; tedcruz; trump; trump2016; trumpwasright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Any guesses as to what else Trump has up his sleeve?
1
posted on
01/20/2016 7:34:16 AM PST
by
LesDowrey
To: LesDowrey
2
posted on
01/20/2016 7:37:49 AM PST
by
petercooper
(Coexist my ass!)
To: LesDowrey
His pro-abort sister for SCOTUS.
3
posted on
01/20/2016 7:39:24 AM PST
by
Slyfox
(Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
To: LesDowrey
Les, Thanks for posting a balanced analysis! These are getting rarer and rarer!
4
posted on
01/20/2016 7:40:13 AM PST
by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
To: LesDowrey
Trump had a very, very good day yesterday.
5
posted on
01/20/2016 7:43:09 AM PST
by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittancez)
To: LesDowrey
Sara is hated and savaged by the GOPe. By having her on the stage, Trump is sending a signal. If you hate the GOPe, I’m your man.
That’s all it is. Simple as that.
6
posted on
01/20/2016 7:44:50 AM PST
by
DesertRhino
("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
To: LesDowrey; hoosiermama; Jane Long
I looked TWICE to make see who wrote this ... then I remembered I was confusing Byron York with that awful Rich Lowry.
I need more sleep. I can’t keep pace with you, hoosiermama.
7
posted on
01/20/2016 7:45:52 AM PST
by
onyx
(HAVE YOU MADE YOUR DONATION to OUR FReep-a-Thon? PLEASE MAKE IT TODAY!)
To: LesDowrey
Winning Iowa as this is Cruz’s Alamo
8
posted on
01/20/2016 7:46:53 AM PST
by
Sybeck1
To: LesDowrey
As much as I like Palin, Trump just lost a bunch of Dem votes in the General election. He must think he needs her endorsement to win the Primary....more likely, to keep Cruz from winning.
9
posted on
01/20/2016 7:47:20 AM PST
by
jch10
(Hillary in the Big House, not the White House .)
To: Slyfox
That’s so idiotic. He basically complimented his sister once. And anyone sane knows the chance of getting his sister confirmed by a hostile Senate. His sister is 80 years old. And you’ve already been could spreading outright lies and then claiming you were joking.
10
posted on
01/20/2016 7:51:04 AM PST
by
DesertRhino
("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
To: LesDowrey
More of the politics of trivialities.
To: petercooper
Don’t be dumb. He’s asked Carl Icahn. In fact Trump and Carl are already rolling on the corporate inversion issue.
http://carlicahn.com/needed-legislation-letter/
They are the only ones talking about that. Trump will defend out economic border like no other.
12
posted on
01/20/2016 7:53:51 AM PST
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: LesDowrey
Cruz can fight as long as he needs to, the aide suggested: "It's going to stop when Trump wants it to stop." The New York translation...
13
posted on
01/20/2016 7:54:00 AM PST
by
mac_truck
(aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
To: LesDowrey
Here is what Trump has up his sleeve...MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! GO TRUMP!
14
posted on
01/20/2016 7:54:06 AM PST
by
Awgie
(truth is always stranger than fiction)
To: LesDowrey; nikos1121; nopardons; Jane Long; Amntn
You will want to read
Thanks for posting
15
posted on
01/20/2016 7:55:01 AM PST
by
hoosiermama
(Make America Great Again by uniting Great Americans)
To: Slyfox
Donald Trump on Abortion
I am now pro-life; after years of being pro-choice:
Donald Trump shocked attendees at the conservative CPAC conference in February when he declared himself pro-life after years of supporting the pro-abortion position. Several months ago, when questioned about his position, Trump responded by saying the public "would be surprised" by his stance and, in an interview with Laura Ingraham from Fox News leading up to the conference, Trump characterized himself as "pro-life" and he repeated that apparent reversal when he told the audience at CPAC, "I am pro-life" and pledged to fight for the reversal of ObamaCare, which contains abortion funding loopholes.As the 2012 race intensifies, pro-life advocates must call upon Donald Trump to further explain his stand on important pro-life issues like Supreme Court nominations and repeal of the pro-abortion Obama healthcare law.
Source: Steven Ertelt in LifeNews.com , Apr 8, 2011
I changed my views to pro-life based on personal stories:Q: Evangelicals want to feel secure that they're going to have a nominee that's solid on those social issues.
A: One thing about me, I'm a very honorable guy. I'm pro-life, but I changed my view a number of years ago. One of the primary reasons I changed [was] a friend of mine's wife was pregnant, and he didn't really want the baby. He was crying as he was telling me the story. He ends up having the baby and the baby is the apple of his eye. It's the greatest thing that's ever happened to him. And you know here's a baby that wasn't going to be let into life. And I heard this, and some other stories, and I am pro-life.
Q: So those stories did change you, they came around and changed you?
A: They changed me. Yeah, they changed my view as to that, absolutely.
Source: David Brody interview on CBN.com , Apr 8, 2011
I am pro-life; fight ObamaCare abortion funding:
Billionaire Donald Trump told the Conservative Political Action Conference that he's thinking about running for president. His remarks drew lots of applause and cheers from the crowd, who will play a key role in grass-roots organizing for the eventual 2012 GOP presidential nominee. "I'm well acquainted with winning," Trump said. "That's what this country needs now."
Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p. 31-32 , Jul 2, 2000
________________________________________________________________________________________
15 posted on
01/16/2016 10:51:28 AM PST by
true believer forever (Trump 2016 - I never knew an entire country could have an ephiphany!)
16
posted on
01/20/2016 7:55:02 AM PST
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: DesertRhino
I’m finding, too, that loyalty (both ways) means a lot to Trump. This was a risk, but he weighed the risks and the loyalty to Sarah, especially in light of how she was treated by the media, the Dems and the GOPe and wants to give her the opportunity to be involved with something big again. I’d like to see him involve General Petraeus in the future if he would be willing, to give Petreaus the opportunity to be involved with the movement and clear his name at the same time. Would give Trump military advisor as part of his camp.
17
posted on
01/20/2016 7:55:26 AM PST
by
ripnbang
("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject")
To: DesertRhino
Yes it’s an endorsement, not a running mate.
18
posted on
01/20/2016 7:56:51 AM PST
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: jch10
Sarah’s not a running mate. If she was I’d be worried.
19
posted on
01/20/2016 7:57:59 AM PST
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: LesDowrey
No guesses at all, Trump will be spontaneous and won’t announce much ahead of time....ever.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson