That is correct, of course, and the one-worlders do all they can to mislead and redirect the argument.
The perspective from Jay and Washington and the ENTIRE group of our founders - who, by the way had just fought an enormously bloody and costly revolution which was made even more difficult by "Americans" who were loyal to England - is apparent from both what is in the record and the fact the term NBC was included without debate:
The commander-in-chief's loyalty to the nation shall not be compromised by:
a) birth outside of the U.S. in a nation that may later attempt to influence that loyalty, nor;
b) birth to a non-citizen parent who may later be in a position to influence that loyalty.
Any who argue the founders did not intend such qualifications have the burden of demonstrating the founders intended something else. But there is nothing else, there is no better way of assuring the loyalty of the commander-in-chief. There is no evidence the founders intended anything but NBC in its highest form.
Common sense makes this issue unassailable. True.