Lying, scheming, deceitful, slimy lawyers. And those are the nice things I can say about Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee.
‘After graduating, Weddington found it difficult to find a job with a law firm. She instead joined a group of graduate students at University of Texas-Austin that were researching ways to challenge various anti-abortion statutes. After deciding that a woman should helm a lawsuit to challenge Texas’ statute, Weddington volunteered.
Soon after, a pregnant woman named Norma McCorvey visited a local attorney seeking an abortion. The attorney instead assisted McCorvey with handing over her child for adoption, and after doing so, referred McCorvey to Weddington and Linda Coffee’
Well, Norma’s story conflicts with Weddington’s Wikipedia page. But I suspect that those who edit Wikipedia have an agenda. Weddington had gone to have an abortion in Mexico in 1967 (according to Wikipedia) and was looking for a woman to use, to bring about a case for abortion in the USA. I bet the Left is just really proud of Weddington!
Number 4 and 5 surprised me.
I knew 6 and 7 and 1-3 were interesting but not shocking. But I thought that in a court case the plaintiff had to actually be a part of the process.
BFL
I don’t know if it can be said exactly where the current assault on our constitution began,(probably from the beginning) but I know this, Roe Vs Wade was the spark that lit the all consuming fire that now threatens to destroy our Republic. May be it is too late already but if not this election season is our last chance to restore our Constitutional Free Republic... Choose Wisely!
I knew most of this story.
So, a Law of the Land predicated on a fraud.