The way I see it, one way to get the message out that I (we) don't want any rapefugee migrants in our country is by word of mouth. Perhaps that towel head woman went back to her tent after work and told her husband, relatives about what I mentioned to her when she was at work - and they'll tell another and they'll tell another and so on.
And perhaps the point will get across -en masse- to rapefugee muslim migrants about to be flown here by mullah obama -that they're not going to be very welcome here. Thus, perhaps a large amount of them will have second thoughts about coming. Not a very plausible theory, but you never know. After a few months of Americans speaking their mind to these rapefugees already here, (or born here or not!)... then maybe, just maybe word will get overseas - that rapefugees are not welcome here.
Maybe with fewer rapefugees coming, there might be less assaults and flat out rapes! - even if only one or a few less assaults /and or rapes of our American women occur.
And besides, I didn't curse at that woman or use any kind of profanity. I just asked her - is that some kind of Halloween towel on your head. Whatever...she got my message that I'm not all that glad to see her here!
I knew when I posted the above remarks about the MacDonlds incident here at fr, I was risking attracting no new friends and in fact, I might lose friends here. And thus, I might not seem like a very nice guy afterall, but I'm not here to dwell on being a nice guy nor dwell on making friends. Very few folks here give out their real names and most likely none of us will ever meet each other. I'm here to discuss politics and enjoy discussing politics in my spare time/retirement / and all while not using foul or nasty four letter language in doing so.
And btw rlmorel, I have never suggested or would suggest - as you have - mass carpet bombing - even if it would seem useful in a military situation, and countless civilians perish. In jest, I have posted ....that to prevent Israel from extinction, they might have to have a pre-emptive nuke strike on Iran, but that is a world ending situation.
...we should have lined up squadrons of B52s wingtip to wingtip and carpet bombed that place from one end to another.
3 posted on January 17, 2016 at 2:41:59 PM CST by rlmorel
Two different situations.
One situation is treating people who are, by law (and we are ostensibly a republic governed by laws, are we not?) American citizens in an overtly rude and impolite way. Sorry, that just isn’t the way I act towards others. If you do, that is your business and people who you interact with can draw their own conclusions about what kind of person you are.
The other situation is in a case of an overt act of war. You do understand that seizing an embassy IS an overt act of war, don’t you? This is the same country that has planned and executed unrestricted warfare against innocent civilians in the exact same way that both the Nazi and Japanese regimes did, and I fully support the actions of the allies in bringing that unrestricted warfare to them, as I would the countries who currently support terrorism who commit an overt act of war.
So, please don’t conflate the issues. I don’t take any joy in rude behavior, and I wouldn’t take any joy in unrestricted warfare. The two things don’t belong in the same discussion.
I don’t support your behavior, and deliberately went out of my way not to attack you for it. But because I choose to approach this SPECIFIC aspect differently than you do and said so, and specifically explained why, you have chosen to take it personally.