HaHaHaHa.....you did not answer the question and already you accuse me of being unable to have “an intelligent comversation.” Who is not having “an intelligent conversation “ here?
It’s an invalid question. Not all science is experimental, quite a bit is purely observational. So demanding an experiment to prove observational science is a strawman argument, a deliberate fallacy, thus proving you actually the facts don’t back whatever position it is you’re taking, but you want to argue it anyway. Since you need fallacies we both know that what fight it is you’re trying to pick is one you’ll lose, so we might as well not even start. You’re wrong, you know it, I know, we’re done. Have a great day.